Hierarchical habitat selection by barren-ground grizzly bears in the central Canadian Arctic

被引:92
作者
McLoughlin, PD
Case, RL
Gau, RJ
Cluff, HD
Mulders, R
Messier, F
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Biol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2, Canada
[2] Govt NW Terr, Dept Resources Wildlife & Econ Dev, Yellowknife, NT X1A 3S8, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
grizzly bear; habitat selection; resource selection function; spatial scale; temporal scale;
D O I
10.1007/s00442-002-0941-5
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Using resource selection functions, we examined habitat selection patterns of barren-ground grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in the central Canadian Arctic among and within home ranges. There was no difference between the sexes with regard to habitat selection patterns at the home range level (Wilks' lambda, approx. F-11,F-11=1.27, P=0.37). Bear home ranges contain more esker habitat, tussock/hummock successional tundra, lichen veneer, birch seep, and tall shrub riparian areas relative to the proportional availability of habitats in the study area. We observed differences in habitat selection within home ranges among levels of sex/reproductive status (Wilks' lambda, approx. F-20,F-412=3.32, P<0.001) and by season (Wilks' lambda, approx. F-30,F-605=2.71, P<0.001). Eskers and tall shrub riparian zones were the habitats most preferred by bears throughout the year. Tussock/hummock successional tundra was also favored by males at varying times during the year and lichen veneers were favored in spring and autumn by most bears. Females with cubs tended to avoid the highest ranked habitat for males throughout the year. This pattern of habitat selection was not observed for females without accompanying young. Results of this study underline the importance of scale dependence in habitat selection. Failure to view habitat selection as a hierarchical process may result in a narrow and possibly misleading notion of habitat selection patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 108
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J STAT COMPUT SIM
[2]   Assessing habitat selection when availability changes [J].
Arthur, SM ;
Manly, BFJ ;
McDonald, LL ;
Garner, GW .
ECOLOGY, 1996, 77 (01) :215-227
[3]  
BALLARD WB, 1993, SCI MONOGRAPH US DEP
[4]  
*BHP DIAM, 1995, EC MAPP 1995 BAS STU
[5]   Sexual segregation in black-tailed deer: Effects of scale [J].
Bowyer, RT ;
Kie, JG ;
VanBallenberghe, V .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1996, 60 (01) :10-17
[6]   Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions [J].
Boyce, MS ;
McDonald, LL .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1999, 14 (07) :268-272
[7]  
Case RL, 1998, URSUS-SERIES, V10, P41
[8]   RANK TRANSFORMATIONS AS A BRIDGE BETWEEN PARAMETRIC AND NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICS [J].
CONOVER, WJ ;
IMAN, RL .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1981, 35 (03) :124-129
[9]   AGE DETERMINATION OF GRIZZLY BEARS FROM FOURTH PREMOLAR TOOTH SECTIONS [J].
CRAIGHEAD, JJ ;
CRAIGHEAD, FC ;
MCCUTCHEN, HE .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1970, 34 (02) :353-+
[10]  
EPP H, 2000, VEGETATION CLASSIFIC