A stated preference study for a car ownership model in the context of developing countries

被引:28
作者
Kumar, M.
Rao, K. V. Krishna [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Bombay 400076, Maharashtra, India
[2] Osmania Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Hyderabad 500007, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
stated preference; disaggregate modelling; car ownership; developing countries; India;
D O I
10.1080/03081060600917793
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
A stated preference ( SP) experiment of car ownership was conducted in Mumbai Metropolitan Region ( MMR) of Maharashtra in India. A full factorial experiment was designed to considering various attributes such as travel time, travel cost, projected household income, car loan payment and servicing cost. Data on 357 individuals were collected which resulted in 3213 observations for the calibration of the work trip and recreational trip car ownership models. The car ownership alternatives considered 0, 1 and 2 cars. A multinomial logit framework was used to develop the car ownership model taking the household as a decision unit. The specification and results of the SP car ownership model are discussed. The observed and predicted values matched reasonably when the validity of the SP car ownership model was tested against revealed preference ( RP) data. The car ownership models developed in this study exhibit a satisfactory goodness of fit. It is concluded that the SP modelling approach can be successfully used for modelling car ownership decisions of households in developing countries.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 425
页数:17
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Ang AS., 1975, PROBABILITY CONCEPTS
[2]  
[Anonymous], TRANSPORT RES REC
[3]  
BATES J, 1978, TRAFFIC ENG CONTROL, V19, P562
[4]  
BATES J, 1978, TRAFFIC ENG CONTROL, V19, P486
[5]  
BATES JJ, 1983, TRANSPORT POLICIES C, P252
[6]  
BEESLEY ME, 1964, TRAFFIC TOWNS URBAN, V1, P174
[7]  
Ben-Akiva M., 1985, Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand
[8]   A BEHAVIORAL-APPROACH TO MODELING HOUSEHOLD MOTOR-VEHICLE OWNERSHIP AND APPLICATIONS TO AGGREGATE POLICY ANALYSIS [J].
BENAKIVA, M ;
MANSKI, CF ;
SHERMAN, L .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1981, 13 (04) :399-411
[9]   A comparison of two alternative behavioral choice mechanisms for household auto ownership decisions [J].
Bhat, CR ;
Pulugurta, V .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1998, 32 (01) :61-75
[10]  
BRADLEY MA, 1990, P 69 TRANSP RES BOAR