Community structure analyses are more sensitive to differences in soil bacterial communities than anonymous diversity indices

被引:156
作者
Hartmann, Martin [1 ]
Widmer, Franco [1 ]
机构
[1] ART Res Stn, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1128/AEM.01464-06
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Changes in the diversity and structure of soil microbial communities may offer a key to understanding the impact of environmental factors on soil quality in agriculturally managed systems. Twenty-five years of biodynamic, bio-organic, or conventional management in the DOK long-term experiment in Switzerland significantly altered soil bacterial community structures, as assessed by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis. To evaluate these results, the relation between bacterial diversity and bacterial community structures and their discrimination potential were investigated by sequence and T-RFLP analyses of 1,904 bacterial 16S rRNA gene clones derived from the DOK soils. Standard anonymous diversity indices such as Shannon, Chao1, and ACE or rarefaction analysis did not allow detection of management-dependent influences on the soil bacterial community. Bacterial community structures determined by sequence and T-RFLP analyses of the three gene libraries substantiated changes previously observed by soil bacterial community level T-RFLP profiling. This supported the value of high-throughput monitoring tools such as T-RFLP analysis for assessment of differences in soil microbial communities. The gene library approach also allowed identification of potential management-specific indicator taxa, which were derived from nine different bacterial phyla. These results clearly demonstrate the advantages of community structure analyses over those based on anonymous diversity indices when analyzing complex soil microbial communities.
引用
收藏
页码:7804 / 7812
页数:9
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Causes and consequences of biological diversity in soil [J].
Bardgett, RD .
ZOOLOGY, 2002, 105 (04) :367-374
[2]   Which species? What kind of diversity? Which ecosystem function? Some problems in studies of relations between biodiversity and ecosystem function [J].
Bengtsson, J .
APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 1998, 10 (03) :191-199
[3]   New approaches to analyzing microbial biodiversity data [J].
Bohannan, BJM ;
Hughes, J .
CURRENT OPINION IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 6 (03) :282-287
[4]   Determinants of soil microbial communities: Effects of agricultural management, season, and soil type on phospholipid fatty acid profiles [J].
Bossio, DA ;
Scow, KM ;
Gunapala, N ;
Graham, KJ .
MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 1998, 36 (01) :1-12
[5]   Regulation of diversity: maintenance of species richness in changing environments [J].
Brown, JH ;
Ernest, SKM ;
Parody, JM ;
Haskell, JP .
OECOLOGIA, 2001, 126 (03) :321-332
[6]   The structure of microbial communities in soil and the lasting impact of cultivation [J].
Buckley, DH ;
Schmidt, TM .
MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 2001, 42 (01) :11-21
[7]   Organic and biodynamic management: Effects on soil biology [J].
Carpenter-Boggs, L ;
Kennedy, AC ;
Reganold, JP .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2000, 64 (05) :1651-1659
[8]   Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs [J].
Chenna, R ;
Sugawara, H ;
Koike, T ;
Lopez, R ;
Gibson, TJ ;
Higgins, DG ;
Thompson, JD .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2003, 31 (13) :3497-3500
[9]   The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): sequences and tools for high-throughput rRNA analysis [J].
Cole, JR ;
Chai, B ;
Farris, RJ ;
Wang, Q ;
Kulam, SA ;
McGarrell, DM ;
Garrity, GM ;
Tiedje, JM .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2005, 33 :D294-D296
[10]   Prokaryotic diversity and its limits: microbial community structure in nature and implications for microbial ecology [J].
Curtis, TP ;
Sloan, WT .
CURRENT OPINION IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 7 (03) :221-226