Comparative study using various methods for identification of Staphylococcus species in clinical specimens

被引:50
作者
Layer, F. [1 ]
Ghebremedhin, B. [1 ]
Moder, K. -A. [1 ]
Koenig, W. [1 ]
Koenig, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Otto von Guericke Univ, Inst Med Microbiol, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.00226-06
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) play a predominant role in nosocomial infections. Rapid, reliable identification of these organisms is essential for accurate diagnosis and prompt effective treatment of these infections. Quite recently, the VITEK 2 g-positive (gram-positive [GP]) identification card (bioMerieux) has been redesigned for greater accuracy in the identification of gram-positive cocci. We compared the BD Phoenix (Becton Dickinson) and VITEK 2 (bioMerieux) automated microbiology systems, using their respective update version cards, and the API ID32 STAPH test. The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gap) gene-based T-RFLP (terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism) method was used for verifying the results. In total, 86 clinical isolates of CNS and 27 reference strains were analyzed. The results show that for identification of CNS, the automated identification methods using the newest VITEK 2 and BD Phoenix identification cards are comparable. However, API ID32 STAPH revealed more correct results compared to both automated microbiology systems. Despite the increased performance of the phenotypic automated identification systems compared to the former versions, molecular methods, e.g., the gap-based T-RFLP method, still show superior accuracy in identifying Staphylococcus species other than Staphylococcus aureus.
引用
收藏
页码:2824 / 2830
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   EVALUATION OF THE VITEK SYSTEMS GRAM-POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION CARD FOR SPECIES IDENTIFICATION OF COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI [J].
BANNERMAN, TL ;
KLEEMAN, KT ;
KLOOS, WE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 31 (05) :1322-1325
[2]   Development and evaluation of a quality-controlled ribosomal sequence database for 16S ribosomal DNA-based identification of Staphylococcus species [J].
Becker, K ;
Harmsen, D ;
Mellmann, A ;
Meier, C ;
Schumann, P ;
Peters, G ;
von Eiff, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (11) :4988-4995
[3]   Determining the clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from blood cultures [J].
Beekmann, SE ;
Diekema, DJ ;
Doern, GV .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 26 (06) :559-566
[4]   Erroneous reporting of coagulase-negative staphylococci as Kocuria spp. by the Vitek 2 system [J].
Ben-Ami, R ;
Navon-Venezia, S ;
Schwartz, D ;
Schlezinger, Y ;
Mekuzas, Y ;
Carmeli, Y .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 43 (03) :1448-1450
[5]  
Boudewijns M, 2005, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V43, P5832, DOI 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5832.2005
[6]  
Crossley KB., 1997, STAPHYLOCOCCI HUMAN
[7]  
Cunha MLRS, 2004, MEM I OSWALDO CRUZ, V99, P855, DOI 10.1590/S0074-02762004000800012
[8]   List of bacterial names with standing in nomenclature: A folder available on the Internet [J].
Euzeby, JP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC BACTERIOLOGY, 1997, 47 (02) :590-592
[9]   Two-center collaborative evaluation of the performance of the BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterococcus spp. and Staphylococcus spp. [J].
Fahr, AM ;
Eigner, U ;
Armbrust, M ;
Caganic, A ;
Dettori, G ;
Chezzi, C ;
Bertoncini, L ;
Benecchi, M ;
Menozzi, MG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (03) :1135-1142
[10]   Use of the MicroSeq 500 16S rRNA gene-based sequencing for identification of bacterial isolates that commercial automated systems failed to identify correctly [J].
Fontana, C ;
Favaro, M ;
Pelliccioni, M ;
Pistoia, ES ;
Favalli, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 43 (02) :615-619