Direct current electrical conduction block of peripheral nerve

被引:127
作者
Bhadra, N [1 ]
Kilgore, KL
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, VA Med Ctr, MetroHlth Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44109 USA
[2] MetroHlth Med Ctr, Rehab Engn Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44109 USA
关键词
conduction block; depolarization; direct current (dc); peripheral nerve;
D O I
10.1109/TNSRE.2004.834205
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 [生物医学工程];
摘要
Electrical currents can be used to produce a block of action potential conduction in whole nerves. This block has a rapid onset and reversal. The mechanism of electrical nerve conduction block has not been conclusively determined, and inconsistencies appear in the literature regarding whether the block is produced by membrane hyperpolarization, depolarization, or through some other means. We have used simulations in a nerve membrane model, coupled with in vivo experiments, to identify the mechanism and principles of electrical conduction block. A nerve simulation package (Neuron) was used to model direct current (dc) block in squid, frog, and mammalian neuron models. A frog sciatic nerve/gastrocnemius preparation was used to examine nerve conduction block in vivo. Both simulations and experiments confirm that depolarization block requires less current than hyperpolarization block. Dynamic simulations suggest that block can occur under both the real physical electrode as well as adjacent virtual electrode sites. A hypothesis is presented which formulates the likely types of dc block and the possible block current requirements. The results indicate that electrical currents generally produce a conduction block due to depolarization of the nerve membrane, resulting in an inactivation of the sodium channels.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 324
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
SELECTIVE ACTIVATION OF PERIPHERAL-NERVE FIBER GROUPS OF DIFFERENT DIAMETER BY TRIANGULAR SHAPED STIMULUS PULSES [J].
ACCORNERO, N ;
BINI, G ;
LENZI, GL ;
MANFREDI, M .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1977, 273 (03) :539-560
[2]
Selective suppression of sphincter activation during sacral anterior nerve root stimulation [J].
Bhadra, N ;
Grünewald, V ;
Creasey, G ;
Mortimer, JT .
NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2002, 21 (01) :55-64
[3]
CAMPBELL BERRY, 1966, BULL LOS ANGELES NEUROL SOC, V31, P63
[4]
OBSERVATIONS ON ANODAL POLARIZATION OF CUTANEOUS NERVE [J].
CASEY, KL ;
BLICK, M .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1969, 13 (01) :155-&
[5]
IMPULSES IN SLOWLY CONDUCTING VAGAL FIBERS FROM AFFERENT ENDINGS IN VEINS, ATRIA, AND ARTERIES OF DOGS AND CATS [J].
COLERIDGE, HM ;
COLERIDGE, JC ;
DANGEL, A ;
KIDD, C ;
LUCK, JC ;
SLEIGHT, P .
CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 1973, 33 (01) :87-97
[6]
PULMONARY STRETCH RECEPTOR ACTIVITY IN MAN - COMPARISON WITH DOG AND CAT [J].
GUZ, A ;
TRENCHARD, DW .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1971, 213 (02) :329-+
[7]
The NEURON simulation environment [J].
Hines, ML ;
Carnevale, NT .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1997, 9 (06) :1179-1209
[8]
NEURON: A tool for neuroscientists [J].
Hines, ML ;
Carnevale, NT .
NEUROSCIENTIST, 2001, 7 (02) :123-135
[9]
EFFECT OF ANODAL BLOCKADE OF MYELINATED FIBERS ON VAGAL C-FIBER AFFERENTS [J].
HOPP, FA ;
ZUPERKU, EJ ;
COON, RL ;
KAMPINE, JP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 239 (05) :R454-R462
[10]
KATO M, 1974, EXP BRAIN RES, V20, P135