Cost effectiveness of paclitaxel/cisplatin compared with cyclophosphamide/cisplatin in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer in Belgium

被引:13
作者
Neymark, N
Gorlia, T
Adriaenssen, I
Baron, B
Piccart, M
机构
[1] European Org Res Treatment Canc, Ctr Data, Hlth Econ Unit, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Inst Jules Bordet, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-200220070-00006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the economic impact of two polychemotherapy regimens for patients with advanced ovarian cancer from the perspective of the Belgian health insurance and financing system. Design: An economic evaluation was integrated in an intergroup randomised controlled trial (EORTC 55931) in which patients were randomised to receive the new treatment of paclitaxel and cisplatin or the standard therapy of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin. Data on the use of medical resources were collected prospectively for the 231 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) patients in the trial and costs were valued by using unit prices. The outcome for the economic evaluation was mean survival time as determined by the so-called restricted means method, with the time point of restriction fixed by statistical criteria. A correction of censoring of the cost data collected in the trial was also performed. Main outcome measures and results: The paclitaxel and cisplatin group experienced a statistically significant improvement in mean survival time of 4 months, which was associated with an increase in the average total cost per patient of 6795 euros (EUR; 1998 values), when costs were assessed over the same period as the gain in mean survival time. This corresponds to a point estimate of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR20 385 per life-year gained. The impact of uncertainty was assessed by using a bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap method with 5000 resamples, and the final results of the analysis are expressed in terms of a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. Conclusions: The present economic evaluation has shown that the substitution of paclitaxel for cyclophosphamide in the chemotherapy regimen for women with advanced ovarian cancer leads to a significant improvement in patient survival, which is associated with an increase in costs for the Belgian health insurance system.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 497
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
ANNEMANS L, 1998, 70 EUR ATH SOC C SEP
[2]   Healthcare resource utilisation and costs of treating NSAID-associated gastrointestinal toxicity -: A multinational perspective [J].
Chevat, C ;
Peña, BM ;
Al, MJ ;
Rutten, FFH .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (01) :17-32
[3]  
Collett D, 2014, MODELLING SURVIVAL D
[4]   Economic and policy implications of adopting paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced ovarian cancer: An Ontario perspective [J].
Elit, LM ;
Gafni, A ;
Levine, MN .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (02) :632-639
[5]   THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN COST AND CHARGES [J].
FINKLER, SA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1982, 96 (01) :102-109
[6]  
Gold MR, 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H
[7]  
HAELTERMAN M, 1995, CANC BELGIUM 1990 19
[8]  
Hougaard P., 2012, ANAL MULTIVARIATE SU
[9]  
*INAMI, 1998, NOM PREST SANT
[10]  
Irwin JO, 1949, J HYGIENE, V47, P457