Agreement between the Takeda UA-731 automatic blood pressure measuring device and the manual mercury sphygmomanometer: An assessment under field conditions in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

被引:3
作者
Cartwright, C
Unwin, N
Stephenson, P
机构
[1] UNIV SUNDERLAND, DEPT PHYSIOL, SUNDERLAND, DURHAM, ENGLAND
[2] UNIV NEWCASTLE, DEPT EPIDEMIOL & PUBL HLTH, NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE, TYNE & WEAR, ENGLAND
[3] UNIV NEWCASTLE, DEPT MED, NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE, TYNE & WEAR, ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jech.50.2.218
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Study objective - To assess agreement between two Takeda UA-731 automatic blood pressure measuring devices (referred to as machines A and B) and two manual mercury sphygmomanometers. Design - A 'Y' connector attached each Takeda UA-731 to a manual mercury sphygmomanometer. Simultaneous measurements were made on adult subjects. Setting - A population based cardiovascular disease survey in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Participants - Measurements on machine A were compared in 71 individuals (all women), and on machine B in 75 individuals (9 men, 66 women). The age range of subjects was 28 to 76 years and median ages were 59 years for machine A and 50 years for machine B. Main results - Blood pressure (mmHg) ranged from 72 to 212 systolic and 44 to 102 diastolic. Both Takedas gave significantly lower readings than the manual devices for systolic and diastolic pressures: differences were mean (SD: 95% CI) 3.7 mmHg (6.5: 2.2, 5.2) for machine A systolic, 2.3 mmHg (4.5: 1.3, 3.4) machine A diastolic; 1.8 mmHg (6.2: 0.4, 3.3) machine B systolic, and 1.8 (4.4: 0.8, 2.8) machine B diastolic. On the British Hypertension Society criteria, machine A was graded C on systolic measurements and B on diastolic; machine B was graded B on both systolic and diastolic measurements. Conclusions - The performance of these machines compares favourably with the Dinamap 8100, recently adopted for survey work by the Department of Health. The Takeda UA-731 looks promising for epidemiological survey work but before it can be fully recommended further evaluations are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 222
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
*A D COMP LTD, 1992, UA 731 DIG BLOOD PRE
[2]   A REVIEW OF COMMON ERRORS IN THE INDIRECT MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD-PRESSURE - SPHYGMOMANOMETRY [J].
BAILEY, RH ;
BAUER, JH .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 153 (24) :2741-2748
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]  
Bolling K., 1994, The Dinamap 8100 calibration study: HM Stationery Office
[5]  
BRUCE NG, 1990, J HYPERTENS, V8, pS11
[6]  
JAMIESON M, 1990, BLOOD PRESSURE MEASU
[7]  
MACKIE A, 1995, J HUM HYPERTENS, V9, P337
[8]  
O'Brien E., 1993, J HYPERTENS, V11, P667
[9]   THE BRITISH-HYPERTENSION-SOCIETY PROTOCOL FOR THE EVALUATION OF AUTOMATED AND SEMIAUTOMATED BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASURING DEVICES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO AMBULATORY SYSTEMS [J].
OBRIEN, E ;
PETRIE, J ;
LITTLER, W ;
DESWIET, M ;
PADFIELD, PL ;
OMALLEY, K ;
JAMIESON, M ;
ALTMAN, D ;
BLAND, M ;
ATKINS, N .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1990, 8 (07) :607-619
[10]   COMPARATIVE ACCURACY OF 6 AMBULATORY DEVICES ACCORDING TO BLOOD-PRESSURE LEVELS [J].
OBRIEN, E ;
ATKINS, N ;
MEE, F ;
OMALLEY, K .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1993, 11 (06) :673-675