Inertia in Japanese organizations: Knowledge management routines and failure to innovate

被引:97
作者
Collinson, Simon [1 ]
Wilson, David C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
innovation; knowledge management; Japanese; embedded routines; strategic repertoires;
D O I
10.1177/0170840606067248
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper argues that features of Japanese organizations, previously held to be the foundations of innovation, change and flexibility, can equally be significant barriers to change, innovation and adaptation in turbulent economic environments. This paper draws on two in-depth case studies of Japanese organizations. It shows how, in both cases, these firms displayed specific weaknesses in the ways in which they integrate and bundle knowledge, in particular around their research and development (R&D) functions. Despite the adoption of strategies of technological innovation and internationalization, the data suggest that the pursuit of both strategies is beset by barriers of inertia. Embedded internal network connections and knowledge-sharing routines between central R&D and other divisions are inappropriate for the revised strategy. Existing external connections, with preferred suppliers and customers within keiretsu structures, and close relationships with existing R&D partners retard these firms' strategic flexibility. With a limited variety of latent routines, knowledge, capabilities and agency to draw on when needed, these firms have limited organizational responsiveness and high levels of path-dependency.
引用
收藏
页码:1359 / 1387
页数:29
相关论文
共 113 条
[1]   Odd couple:: Making sense of the curious concept of knowledge management [J].
Alvesson, M ;
Kärreman, D .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2001, 38 (07) :995-1018
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, MANAGING PRODUCT DEV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, PRODUCT DEV CHALLENG
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FLEXIBLE FIRM CAPABI
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Knowledge Works: Managing Intellectual Capital of Toshiba
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Can Japan Compete?
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1990, ICARUS PARADOX EXCEL
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1968, The management of innovation
[9]  
Archibugi D., 2001, Econ Innov New Technol, V10, P415, DOI DOI 10.1080/10438590100000016
[10]   THE ECONOMIC-IMPLICATIONS OF LEARNING BY DOING [J].
ARROW, KJ .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1962, 29 (80) :155-173