Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction

被引:352
作者
Foerde, Karin
Knowlton, Barbara J.
Poldrack, Russell A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Brain Res Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
hippocampus; learning; striatum;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0602659103
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Different forms of learning and memory depend on functionally and anatomically separable neural circuits [Squire, L. R. (1992) Psychol. Rev. 99, 195-231]. Declarative memory relies on a medial temporal lobe system, whereas habit learning relies on the striatum [Cohen, N.J. & Eichenbaum, H. (1993) Memory, Amnesia, and the Hippocampal System (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)]. How these systems are engaged to optimize learning and behavior is not clear. Here, we present results from functional neuroimaging showing that the presence of a demanding secondary task during learning modulates the degree to which subjects solve a problem using either declarative memory or habit learning. Dual-task conditions did not reduce accuracy but reduced the amount of declarative learning about the task. Medial temporal lobe activity was correlated with task performance and declarative knowledge after learning under single-task conditions, whereas performance was correlated with striatal activity after dual-task learning conditions. These results demonstrate a fundamental difference in these memory systems in their sensitivity to concurrent distraction. The results are consistent with the notion that declarative and habit learning compete to mediate task performance, and they suggest that the presence of distraction can bias this competition. These results have implications for learning in multitask situations, suggesting that, even if distraction does not decrease the overall level of learning, it can result in the acquisition of knowledge that can be applied less flexibly in new situations.
引用
收藏
页码:11778 / 11783
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Human midbrain sensitivity to cognitive feedback and uncertainty during classification learning [J].
Aron, AR ;
Shohamy, D ;
Clark, J ;
Myers, C ;
Gluck, MA ;
Poldrack, RA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 92 (02) :1144-1152
[2]  
Bayley PJ, 2002, J NEUROSCI, V22, P5741
[3]   Robust habit learning in the absence of awareness and independent of the medial temporal lobe [J].
Bayley, PJ ;
Frascino, JC ;
Squire, LR .
NATURE, 2005, 436 (7050) :550-553
[4]   Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Beckmann, CF ;
Smith, SA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2004, 23 (02) :137-152
[5]  
Cohen N. J., 1993, Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system
[6]   Perceptual implicit memory relies on intentional, load-sensitive processing at encoding [J].
Crabb, BT ;
Dark, VJ .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2003, 31 (07) :997-1008
[7]   The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory [J].
Craik, FIM ;
Govoni, R ;
NavehBenjamin, M ;
Anderson, ND .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1996, 125 (02) :159-180
[8]  
FOERDE K, IN PRESS MEM COGNIT
[9]  
Friston K J, 1994, Hum Brain Mapp, V1, P210, DOI 10.1002/hbm.460010306
[10]   The well-worn route and the path less traveled: Distinct neural bases of route following and wayfinding in humans [J].
Hartley, T ;
Maguire, EA ;
Spiers, HJ ;
Burgess, N .
NEURON, 2003, 37 (05) :877-888