Developing low-carbon cities through pilots

被引:130
作者
Wang, Yufei [1 ]
Song, Qijiao [1 ]
He, Jijiang [2 ]
Qi, Ye [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Nucl & New Energy Technol, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
China; CO2; emissions; low-carbon city pilots (LCCPs); ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; CO2; EMISSIONS; CITY; CHINA; URBANIZATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1080/14693062.2015.1050347
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nationwide rapid urbanization has been a key driver of economic growth, energy consumption, and carbon emission in China. To avoid the high energy consumption and pollution present in other industrialized countries, China is making the economic and social transition from a high-carbon model to a low-carbon model. The low-carbon city pilots (LCCPs) programme was launched by the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) to resolve the dilemma between economic development and transitioning to a low-carbon model. The status quos of these pilots in different regions have set CO2 intensity per unit of gross domestic product (GDP), CO2 emissions per capita, CO2 reduction targets, and CO2 discharge peak times. Traditional policies, including those aimed at improving energy efficiency, applying renewable energy, adjusting sector structure, and increasing carbon sequestration capacity, are being widely applied in the form of command-mandatory tools, market-economic tools, and voluntary tools. By summarizing these policies, low-carbon development plans, LCCP governments reports, and a case study focusing on Zhenjiang (practical experiences based on city features), this article proposes implications for how to achieve the LCCPs' low-carbon goals.Policy relevanceChina has launched a low-carbon city pilots (LCCPs) programme to promote its future low-carbon urbanization, but the cities concerned have not yet managed to achieve true low-carbon' status in terms of CO2 per unit of GDP and CO2 per capita. To improve the performance of LCCPs, central government should provide guidance on institutional framework and policies, while local governments should establish carbon management systems. Both central and local governments should establish a policy assessment system and use integrated policy tools as part of their low-carbon development plans.
引用
收藏
页码:S81 / S103
页数:23
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CHIN EN STAT YB 2012
[2]  
[Anonymous], URBAN PLANNING FORUM
[3]  
[Anonymous], CHINA NEW CLIMATE EC
[4]  
[Anonymous], CHIN STAT YB 2006 20
[5]   The benchmarks of carbon emissions and policy implications for China's cities: Case of Nanjing [J].
Bi, Jun ;
Zhang, Rongrong ;
Wang, Haikun ;
Liu, Miaomiao ;
Wu, Yi .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (09) :4785-4794
[6]   The exploration of concepts and methods for Low-Carbon Eco-City Planning [J].
Cao, Shan ;
Li, Chi .
INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP FROM THE INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING AND SOFTWARE (IEMSS2010), 2011, 5 :199-207
[7]  
Chen S., 2012, CHINA POPULATION RES, V3, P230
[8]  
Council of Scientific Research on China's City, 2009, CHIN LOW CARB EC CIT
[9]  
Dai Y.X., 2009, MODERN URBAN RES, V24, P7
[10]  
Ding D., 2013, REV EC RES, V43, P92