The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan

被引:1659
作者
Chen, Yu-Shan [1 ]
Lai, Shyh-Bao
Wen, Chao-Tung
机构
[1] Natl Yunlin Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Business Adm, Touliu 640, Yunlin, Taiwan
[2] Natl Chengchi Univ, Dept Business Adm, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Chengchi Univ, Grad Inst Technol & Innovat Management, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Natl Chengchi Univ, Coll Commerce, EMBA Program, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
green innovation; green product innovation; green process innovation; competitive advantage; corporate environmental management; sustainable development;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to explore whether the performance of the green innovation brought positive effect to the competitive advantage. This study found that the performances of the green product innovation and green process innovation were positively correlated to the corporate competitive advantage. Therefore, the result meant that the investment in the green product innovation and green process innovation was helpful to the businesses. This study argued that the businesses should cognize the correct value and positioning of the green innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 339
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GREEN MARKETING
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 8341 ISO
[3]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[4]  
Berry M. A., 1998, Academy of Management Perspectives, V12, P38, DOI [10.5465/ame.1998.650515, DOI 10.5465/AME.1998.650515]
[5]  
*BUS EXPR CO, 2003, BUS DIR TAIW, P23
[6]   PARADIGM FOR DEVELOPING BETTER MEASURES OF MARKETING CONSTRUCTS [J].
CHURCHILL, GA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1979, 16 (01) :64-73
[7]   SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE - WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT ISNT [J].
COYNE, KP .
BUSINESS HORIZONS, 1986, 29 (01) :54-61
[8]  
GREENO JL, 1992, COLUMBIA J WORLD BUS, V27, P222
[9]  
Hair J. F., 1992, Multivariate data analysis, V3rd
[10]   A NATURAL-RESOURCE-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM [J].
HART, SL .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (04) :986-1014