Decomposition using maximum autocorrelation factors

被引:31
作者
Larsen, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
maximum autocorrelation factors; shape; ordered variables; ordered observations;
D O I
10.1002/cem.743
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper presents methods for the analysis and decomposition of multivariate data sets where a given ordering/structure of the observations or the variables exists. Examples of such data sets are found in remote sensing imagery, where observations (pixels) each consisting of a reflectance spectrum are organized in a two-dimensional grid. Another example is biological shape analysis. Here each observation (e.g. human bone, cerebral ventricle) is represented by a number of landmarks, the co-ordinates of which are the variables. Here we do not have an ordering of the observations (individuals). However, normally we have an ordering of landmarks (variables) along the contour of the objects. For the case with observation ordering, the maximum autocorrelation factor (MAF) transform was proposed for multivariate imagery (Switzer P. In Computer Science and Statistics, Billard L (ed.). Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1985;13-16). This corresponds to an R-mode analysis of the data matrix. We propose to extend this concept to situations with variable ordering. This corresponds to a Q-mode analysis of the data matrix. We call this method the Q-MAF decomposition. It turns out that in many situations the new variables resulting from MAF and Q-MAF analyses can be interpreted as a decomposition of (spatial) frequency. However, contrary to Fourier decomposition, these new variables are located in frequency as well as location (space, time, wavelength, etc. (C) Copyright 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 435
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Anderson E., 1995, LAPACK USERS GUIDE
[2]   Surface-bounded growth modeling applied to human mandibles [J].
Andresen, P ;
Bookstein, FL ;
Conradsen, K ;
Ersboll, BK ;
Marsh, JL ;
Kreiborg, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2000, 19 (11) :1053-1063
[3]  
CONRADSEN K, 1985, P S APPL STAT LYNGB, P47
[4]   ACTIVE SHAPE MODELS - THEIR TRAINING AND APPLICATION [J].
COOTES, TF ;
TAYLOR, CJ ;
COOPER, DH ;
GRAHAM, J .
COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 1995, 61 (01) :38-59
[5]  
Dryden IL., 2016, STAT SHAPE ANAL
[6]   PROCRUSTES METHODS IN THE STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS OF SHAPE [J].
GOODALL, C .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1991, 53 (02) :285-339
[7]   A TRANSFORMATION FOR ORDERING MULTISPECTRAL DATA IN TERMS OF IMAGE QUALITY WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR NOISE REMOVAL [J].
GREEN, AA ;
BERMAN, M ;
SWITZER, P ;
CRAIG, MD .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1988, 26 (01) :65-74
[8]  
HOGG DC, 1998, P 2 INT WORKSH COOP, P187
[9]  
Hotelling H, 1936, BIOMETRIKA, V28, P321, DOI 10.2307/2333955
[10]   ON A THEOREM STATED BY ECKART AND YOUNG [J].
JOHNSON, RM .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1963, 28 (03) :259-263