The accuracy of physical examination to detect abdominal aortic aneurysm

被引:98
作者
Fink, HA
Lederle, FA [1 ]
Roth, CS
Bowles, CA
Nelson, DB
Haas, MA
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Dept Med 3 0, Minneapolis, MN 55417 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ctr Chron Dis Outcomes Res, Minneapolis, MN 55417 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.160.6.833
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Abdominal palpation during physical examination is an important means of detecting abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), but limited information is available on its accuracy. Methods: Two hundred subjects (aged 51-88 years), 99 with and 101 without AAA as determined by previous ultrasound, each underwent physical examination of the abdomen by 2 internists who were blinded to each other's findings and to the ultrasound diagnosis. Results: The overall accuracy of abdominal palpation for detecting AAA was as follows: sensitivity, 68% (95% confidence interval [CI],60%-76%); specificity, 75% (95% CI, 68%-82%); positive-likelihood ratio, 2.7 (95% CI, 2.0-3.6); negative likelihood ratio 0.43 (95% CI, 0.33-0.56). Interobserver pair agreement for AAA vs no AAA between the first and second examinations was 77% (kappa = 0.53). Sensitivity increased with AAA diameter, from 61% for AAAs of 3.0 to 3.9 cm, to 69% for AAAs of 4.0 to 4.9 cm, 72% for AAAs of 4.0 cm or larger, and 82% for AAAs of 5.0 cm or larger. Sensitivity in subjects with an abdominal girth less than 100 cm (40-in waistline) was 91% vs 53% for girth of 100 cm or greater (P<.001). When girth was 100 cm or greater and the aorta was palpable, sensitivity was 82%. When girth was less than 100 cm and the AAA was 5.0 cm or larger, sensitivity was 100% (12 examinations). Factors independently associated with correct examination findings included AAA diameter (odds ratio [OR], 1.95 per centimeter increase; 95% CI, 1.06-3.58); abdominal girth (OR, 0.90 per centimeter in crease; 95% CI, 0.87-0.94); and the examiner's assessment that the abdomen was not tight (OR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.17-6.13). Conclusions: Abdominal palpation has only moderate overall sensitivity for detecting AAA, but appears to be highly sensitive for diagnosis of AAAs large enough to warrant elective intervention in patients who do not have a large girth. Abdominal palpation has good sensitivity even in patients with a large girth if the aorta is palpable.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 836
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
BERRY DA, 1996, STAT THEORY METHODS, P205
[2]  
Fleiss J. L, 1981, STAT METHODS RATES P, P212
[3]  
FOWKES FGR, 1986, LANCET, V1, P493
[4]   SCREENING FOR ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM IN MEN AGES 60 TO 80 YEARS - A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS [J].
FRAME, PS ;
FRYBACK, DG ;
PATTERSON, C .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 119 (05) :411-416
[5]   EPIDEMIOLOGY OF AORTIC-ANEURYSM IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
GILLUM, RF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 48 (11) :1289-1298
[6]   Reliability and accuracy of physical examination in detection of abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Kiev, J ;
Eckhardt, A ;
Kerstein, MD .
VASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 31 (02) :143-146
[7]   Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm? [J].
Lederle, FA ;
Simel, DL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (01) :77-82
[8]   SELECTIVE SCREENING FOR ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSMS WITH PHYSICAL-EXAMINATION AND ULTRASOUND [J].
LEDERLE, FA ;
WALKER, JM ;
REINKE, DB .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1988, 148 (08) :1753-1756
[9]   LONGITUDINAL DATA-ANALYSIS USING GENERALIZED LINEAR-MODELS [J].
LIANG, KY ;
ZEGER, SL .
BIOMETRIKA, 1986, 73 (01) :13-22
[10]   THE DYNAMIC NATURE OF SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY [J].
LOFGREN, RP .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1987, 2 (06) :452-453