Detection of enteroviruses and hepatitis a virus in water by consensus primer multiplex RT-PCR

被引:22
作者
Li, JW [1 ]
Wang, XW [1 ]
Yuan, CQ [1 ]
Zheng, JL [1 ]
Jin, M [1 ]
Song, N [1 ]
Shi, XQ [1 ]
Chao, FH [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Hlth & Environm Med, Dept Environm & Hlth, Tianjin 300050, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v8.i4.699
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To develop a rapid detection method of enteroviruses and Hepatitis A virus (HAV). METHODS: A one-step, single-tube consensus primers multiplex RT-PCR was developed to simultaneously detect Pollovirus, Coxsackie virus, Echovirus and HAV. A general upstream primer and a HAV primer and four different sets of primers (5 primers) specific for Pollovirus, Coxsacki evirus, Echovirus and HAV cDNA were mixed in the PCR mixture to reverse transcript and amplify the target DNA. Four distinct amplified DNA segments representing Poliovirus, Coxsackie virus, Echovirus and HAV were identified by gel electrophoresis as 589-,671-, 1084-, and 1128bp sequences, respectively. Semi-nested PCR was used to confirm the amplified products for each enterovirus and HAV. RESULTS: All four kinds of viral genome RNA were detected, and producing four bands which could be differentiated by the band size on the gel. To confirm the specificity of the multiplex PCR products, seminested PCR was performed. For all the four strains tested gave positive results The detection sensitivity of multiplex PCR was similar to that of monoplex RTPCR which was 24 PFU for Poliovrus,21 PFU for Coxsackie virus,60 PFU for Echovirus and 105 TCID50 for HAV. The minimum amount of enteric viral RNA detected by semi-nested PCR was equivalent to 2.4 PFU for Poliovrus, 2.1 PFU for Coxsackie virus, 6.0 PFU for Echovirus and 10.5 TCID50 for HAV. CONCLUSION: The consensus primers multiplex RT-PCR has more advantages over monoplex RT-PCR for enteric viruses detection, namely, the rapid turnaround time and cost effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 702
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   RAPID DETECTION OF POLIOVIRUS BY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION AND POLYMERASE CHAIN AMPLIFICATION - APPLICATION FOR DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN POLIOVIRUS AND NONPOLIOVIRUS ENTEROVIRUSES [J].
ABRAHAM, R ;
CHONMAITREE, T ;
MCCOMBS, J ;
PRABHAKAR, B ;
LOVERDE, PT ;
OGRA, PL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 31 (02) :395-399
[2]   MOLECULAR-DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF ENTEROVIRUSES USING ENZYMATIC AMPLIFICATION AND NUCLEIC-ACID HYBRIDIZATION [J].
CHAPMAN, NM ;
TRACY, S ;
GAUNTT, CJ ;
FORTMUELLER, U .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1990, 28 (05) :843-850
[3]   ANALYSIS OF POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION-AMPLIFIED DNA PRODUCTS BY MASS-SPECTROMETRY USING MATRIX-ASSISTED LASER-DESORPTION AND ELECTROSPRAY - CURRENT STATUS [J].
DOKTYCZ, MJ ;
HURST, GB ;
HABIBIGOUDARZI, S ;
MCLUCKEY, SA ;
TANG, K ;
CHEN, CH ;
UZIEL, M ;
JACOBSON, KB ;
WOYCHIK, RP ;
BUCHANAN, MV .
ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1995, 230 (02) :205-214
[4]   REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION MULTIPLEX PCR FOR DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN POLIOVIRUSES AND ENTEROVIRUSES FROM CLINICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL-SAMPLES [J].
EGGER, D ;
PASAMONTES, L ;
OSTERMAYER, M ;
BIENZ, K .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 33 (06) :1442-1447
[5]   Enterovirus genomes in wastewater: Concentration on glass wool and glass powder and detection by RT-PCR [J].
Gantzer, C ;
Senouci, S ;
Maul, A ;
Levi, Y ;
Schwartzbrod, L .
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 1997, 65 (02) :265-271
[6]  
Guyader F. le, 1994, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, V60, P3665
[7]  
Li JW, 1998, J VIROL METHODS, V74, P99
[8]  
LI JW, 1996, ZHONG GUO WEISHENG J, V6, P125
[9]  
LI JW, 1996, ZHONGGUO WEI SHENG J, V6, P63
[10]   INCREASED SENSITIVITY OF POLIOVIRUS DETECTION IN TAP WATER CONCENTRATES BY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE-POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION [J].
MA, JF ;
GERBA, CP ;
PEPPER, IL .
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 1995, 55 (03) :295-302