Does venture opportunity variation matter? Investigating systematic process differences between innovative and imitative new ventures

被引:181
作者
Samuelsson, Mikael [1 ,2 ]
Davidsson, Per [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Sch Econ, S-11383 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Jonkoping Int Business Sch, SE-55111 Jonkoping, Sweden
[3] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane Grad Sch Business, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
关键词
Entrepreneurship; New venture creation; Venture opportunity variation; Longitudinal Growth Modelling; LATENT VARIABLE FRAMEWORK; START-UP; ENTREPRENEURIAL TEAM; GROWTH; NASCENT; CAPABILITIES; DISCOVERY; KNOWLEDGE; STRATEGY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s11187-007-9093-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The central thesis in the article is that the venture creation process is different for innovative versus imitative ventures. This holds up; the pace of the process differs by type of venture as do, in line with theory-based hypotheses, the effects of certain human capital (HC) and social capital (SC) predictors. Importantly, and somewhat unexpectedly, the theoretically derived models using HC, SC, and certain controls are relatively successful explaining progress in the creation process for the minority of innovative ventures, but achieve very limited success for the imitative majority. This may be due to a rationalistic bias in conventional theorizing and suggests that there is need for considerable theoretical development regarding the important phenomenon of new venture creation processes. Another important result is that the building up of instrumental social capital, which we assess comprehensively and as a time variant construct, is important for making progress with both types of ventures, and increasingly, so as the process progresses. This result corroborates with stronger operationalization and more appropriate analysis method what previously published research has only been able to hint at.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 255
页数:27
相关论文
共 128 条
  • [1] AGHION PHILIPPE., 1997, ADV EC ECONOMETRICS
  • [2] Aldrich H., 1999, ORG EVOLVING
  • [3] Aldrich H.E., 2001, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, V25, P41, DOI [DOI 10.1177/104225870102500404, 10.1177/104225870102500404]
  • [4] FOOLS RUSH IN - THE INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT OF INDUSTRY CREATION
    ALDRICH, HE
    FIOL, CM
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1994, 19 (04) : 645 - 670
  • [5] Aldrich Howard., 1986, Research in Organizational Behavior, V8, P165
  • [6] Aldrich HowardE., 1999, VARIATIONS IN ORGANIZATION SCIENCE: IN HONOR OF D.T CAMPBELL, P19
  • [7] Anderson J.R., 1990, Cognitive psychology and its implications
  • [8] TECHNOLOGICAL DISCONTINUITIES AND DOMINANT DESIGNS - A CYCLICAL MODEL OF TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE
    ANDERSON, P
    TUSHMAN, ML
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (04) : 604 - 633
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2004, Opportunity identification and entrepreneurial behavior
  • [10] [Anonymous], MARKETING PSYCHOL