Distance-based and stochastic uncertainty analysis for multi-criteria decision analysis in Excel using Visual Basic for Applications

被引:65
作者
Hyde, K. M. [1 ]
Maier, H. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Ctr Appl Modelling Water Engn, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
multi-criteria decision analysis; Visual Basic; uncertainty analysis; Excel; water resources;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.08.004
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A program has been developed in Excel and written in Visual Basic for Applications, which enables a decision maker to examine the robustness of a solution obtained when using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). The distance-based and stochastic uncertainty analysis approaches contained in the program allow a decision to be made with confidence that the alternative chosen is the best performing alternative under the range of probable circumstances. The uncertainty analysis methodology overcomes the limitations of existing sensitivity analysis techniques for MCDA by enabling all of the input parameters to be varied simultaneously within their expected ranges. The Weighted Sum Method (WSM) and PROMETHEE are the MCDA techniques available for the user to select in the program. The program is illustrated by applying it to a sustainable water resource development problem in the Northern Adelaide Plains, South Australia. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All fights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1695 / 1710
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, GENETIC ALGORITHM SE
[2]  
Bana E Costa CA, 1999, MATH MODEL-THEOR APP, V4, P131
[3]   SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF ADDITIVE MULTIATTRIBUTE VALUE MODELS [J].
BARRON, H ;
SCHMIDT, CP .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1988, 36 (01) :122-127
[4]   HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS - THE PROMETHEE METHOD [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, P ;
MARESCHAL, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 24 (02) :228-238
[5]   Optimal scheduling of water pipe replacement using genetic algorithms [J].
Dandy, GC ;
Engelhardt, M .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2001, 127 (04) :214-223
[6]   Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights [J].
Deng, H ;
Yeh, CH ;
Willis, RJ .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2000, 27 (10) :963-973
[7]  
Dias LC, 2000, J OPER RES SOC, V51, P1070, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601012
[8]   RANKING GROUNDWATER-MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES BY MULTICRITERION ANALYSIS [J].
DUCKSTEIN, L ;
TREICHEL, W ;
ELMAGNOUNI, S .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 120 (04) :546-565
[9]   Sensitivity analysis and the expected value of perfect information [J].
Felli, JC ;
Hazen, GB .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (01) :95-109
[10]  
FLEMING N, 1999, SUSTAINABILITY WATER