Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individual-based approach

被引:308
作者
Coulon, A
Cosson, JF
Angibault, JM
Cargnelutti, B
Galan, M
Morellet, N
Petit, E
Aulagnier, S
Hewison, AJM
机构
[1] INRA, Inst Rech Grands Mammiferes, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan, France
[2] INRA, Ctr Biol & Gest Populat, Montferrier Sur Lez, France
[3] Univ Rennes 1, UMR Ethol Evolut Ecol 6652, Paimpont, France
关键词
Capreolus capreolus; connectivity; dispersal; gene flow; habitat fragmentation; isolation-by-distance;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02253.x
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Changes in agricultural practices and forest fragmentation can have a dramatic effect on landscape connectivity and the dispersal of animals, potentially reducing gene flow within populations. In this study, we assessed the influence of woodland connectivity on gene flow in a traditionally forest-dwelling species - the European roe deer - in a fragmented landscape. From a sample of 648 roe deer spatially referenced within a study area of 55 x 40 km, interindividual genetic distances were calculated from genotypes at 12 polymorphic microsatellite loci. We calculated two geographical distances between each pair of individuals: the Euclidean distance (straight line) and the 'least cost distance' (the trajectory that maximizes the use of wooded corridors). We tested the correlation between genetic pairwise distances and the two types of geographical pairwise distance using Mantel tests. The correlation was better using the least cost distance, which takes into account the distribution of wooded patches, especially for females (the correlation was stronger but not significant for males). These results suggest that in a fragmented woodland area roe deer dispersal is strongly linked to wooded structures and hence that gene flow within the roe deer population is influenced by the connectivity of the landscape.
引用
收藏
页码:2841 / 2850
页数:10
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Aars J, 1999, ECOLOGY, V80, P1648, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1648:TEOHCO]2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]  
Andreassen HP, 1998, ECOLOGY, V79, P1223, DOI 10.2307/176738
[4]  
[Anonymous], SPIXIANA S
[5]   Metapopulation genetic structure and migration pathways in the land snail Helix aspersa:: influence of landscape heterogeneity [J].
Arnaud, JF .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2003, 18 (03) :333-346
[6]   INFLUENCES OF REMNANT SIZE, SPACING PATTERN AND CONNECTIVITY ON POPULATION-BOUNDARIES AND DEMOGRAPHY IN EUROS MACROPUS-ROBUSTUS LIVING IN A FRAGMENTED LANDSCAPE [J].
ARNOLD, GW ;
STEVEN, DE ;
WEELDENBURG, JR ;
SMITH, EA .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1993, 64 (03) :219-230
[7]  
Baudry J, 1998, KEY CONCEPTS IN LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, P323
[8]  
BIDEAU E, 1987, ACTA OECOL-OEC APPL, V8, P135
[9]  
Bonferroni CE., 1936, PUBBLICAZIONI R I SU, V8, P3, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412961288.N455
[10]   Genetic estimates of population structure and gene flow: limitations, lessons and new directions [J].
Bossart, JL ;
Prowell, DP .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1998, 13 (05) :202-206