Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopy: does examination type influence perception of pharyngeal residue severity?

被引:142
作者
Kelly, A. M.
Leslie, P.
Beale, T.
Payten, C.
Drinnan, M. J.
机构
[1] UCL Hosp, Head & Neck Tumour Ctr, Head & Neck Unit, London NW1 2PG, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Fac Med Sci, Sch Surg & Reprod Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Freeman Rd Hosp, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE7 7DN, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Royal Natl Throat Nose & Ear Hosp, London WC1X 8DA, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01292.x
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate whether the type of instrumental swallowing examination (Fibreoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) or videofluoroscopy) influences perception of post-swallow pharyngeal residue. Design: Prospective, single-blind assessment of residue from simultaneous videofluoroscopy and FEES recordings. All raters were blind to participant details, to the pairing of the videofluoroscopy and FEES examinations and to the other raters' scores. Setting: Tertiary specialist ENT teaching hospital. Participants: Fifteen adult participants consecutively recruited; seven women and eight men aged between 22 and 73, mean age 53. All participants underwent one FEES examination and one videofluoroscopy examination performed simultaneously. Inclusion criteria: referred to speech and language therapy for assessment of dysphagia. Exclusion criteria: nil by mouth or judged to be at high risk of aspiration. Main outcome measures: The FEES and videofluoroscopy examinations were recorded simultaneously. Fifteen speech and language therapists independently scored pharyngeal residue as none, coating, mild, moderate or severe. All examinations were scored twice by all raters. Results: Intra- and inter-rater agreement were similar for both examinations. There were significant differences between FEES and videofluoroscopy pharyngeal residue severity scores (ANOVA, P < 0.001). FEES residue scores were consistently higher than videofluoroscopy residue scores. Conclusions: Pharyngeal residue was consistently perceived to be greater from FEES than from videofluoroscopy. These findings have significant clinical implications as FEES and videofluoroscopy findings are used to judge aspiration risk and to make recommendations for oral intake. Further research is required to examine the impact of FEES and videofluoroscopy examinations on treatment decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 432
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2003, Journal of Applied Research
  • [2] Aviv J E, 2001, Ear Nose Throat J, V80, P553
  • [3] Prospective, randomized outcome study of endoscopy versus modified barium swallow in patients with dysphagia
    Aviv, JE
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2000, 110 (04) : 563 - 574
  • [4] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [5] How thick is thick? Multicenter study of the rheological and material property characteristics of mealtime fluids and videofluoroscopy fluids
    Cichero, JAY
    Jackson, O
    Halley, PJ
    Murdoch, BE
    [J]. DYSPHAGIA, 2000, 15 (04) : 188 - 200
  • [6] Interjudge and intrajudge reliabilities in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (Fees®) using the penetration-aspiration scale:: A replication study
    Colodny, N
    [J]. DYSPHAGIA, 2002, 17 (04) : 308 - 315
  • [7] Mechanisms involved in postdeglutition retention in the elderly
    Dejaeger, E
    Pelemans, W
    Ponette, E
    Joosten, E
    [J]. DYSPHAGIA, 1997, 12 (02) : 63 - 67
  • [8] Videofluoroscopic assessment of patients with dysphagia: Pharyngeal retention is a predictive factor for aspiration
    Eisenhuber, E
    Schima, W
    Schober, E
    Pokieser, P
    Stadler, A
    Scharitzer, M
    Oschatz, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (02) : 393 - 398
  • [9] Fleiss J. L., 1981, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, V2nd
  • [10] Impaired deglutitive airway protection: A videofluoroscopic analysis of severity and mechanism
    Kahrilas, PJ
    Lin, SZ
    Rademaker, AW
    Logemann, JA
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 113 (05) : 1457 - 1464