Mapping the functional anatomy of task preparation: Priming task-appropriate brain networks

被引:44
作者
Fassbender, Catherine
Foxe, John J.
Garavan, Hugh [1 ]
机构
[1] Trinity Coll Dublin, Dept Psychol, Dublin 2, Ireland
[2] Trinity Coll Dublin, Inst Neurosci, Dublin 2, Ireland
[3] Nathan S Kline Inst Psychiat Res, Cognit Neurophysiol Lab, Cognit Neurosci & Schizophrenia Program, New York, NY USA
[4] NYU, Dept Psychol, Program Cognit Neurosci, City Coll, New York, NY 10003 USA
[5] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Psychiat & Behav Med, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
fMRI; behavior; cognition; top-down control; flanker;
D O I
10.1002/hbm.20223
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The present study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and a cued version of a flanker paradigm to elucidate the effects of task preparation on subsequent brain activation patterns. A mixed block and event-related design was employed to examine activations associated with the cue periods themselves and the cued and un-cued correct responses to incongruent flankers. A number of areas were active during the cues, most notably left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), which was interpreted as subserving a role in task-set maintenance. Widespread activity was noted for correct responses to incongruent flankers, including bilateral parietal and frontal regions, consistent with previous studies. Activation was increased in these regions for correct responses after cue periods. An overlapping network of regions was also noted for cues and correct responses, suggesting preparation of task-appropriate anatomical regions during the cue period. These results suggest that cue periods allow participants to prime task-relevant areas within the brain and highlight the importance of left DLPFC in top-down control.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 827
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Selection, integration, and conflict monitoring: Assessing the nature and generality of prefrontal cognitive control mechanisms [J].
Badre, D ;
Wagner, AD .
NEURON, 2004, 41 (03) :473-487
[2]   Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex [J].
Botvinick, M ;
Nystrom, LE ;
Fissell, K ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
NATURE, 1999, 402 (6758) :179-181
[3]   Conflict monitoring and cognitive control [J].
Botvinick, MM ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (03) :624-652
[4]   The role of the frontal cortex in task preparation [J].
Brass, M ;
von Cramon, DY .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2002, 12 (09) :908-914
[5]   Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of frequency, inhibition and errors [J].
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Gray, JR ;
Molfese, DL ;
Snyder, A .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2001, 11 (09) :825-836
[6]   Prefrontal regions involved in keeping information in and out of mind [J].
Bunge, SA ;
Ochsner, KN ;
Desmond, JE ;
Glover, GH ;
Gabrieli, JDE .
BRAIN, 2001, 124 :2074-2086
[7]   Parsing executive processes: Strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex [J].
Carter, CS ;
Macdonald, AM ;
Botvinick, M ;
Ross, LL ;
Stenger, VA ;
Noll, D ;
Cohen, JD .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (04) :1944-1948
[8]   Dissociation of response conflict, attentional selection, and expectancy with functional magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Casey, BJ ;
Thomas, KM ;
Welsh, TF ;
Badgaiyan, RD ;
Eccard, CH ;
Jennings, JR ;
Crone, EA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (15) :8728-8733
[9]   Parametric analysis of fMRI data using linear systems methods [J].
Cohen, MS .
NEUROIMAGE, 1997, 6 (02) :93-103
[10]   Monitoring for target objects: activation of right frontal and parietal cortices with increasing time on task [J].
Coull, JT ;
Frackowiak, RSJ ;
Frith, CD .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1998, 36 (12) :1325-1334