On-demand and intermittent therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease - Economic considerations

被引:20
作者
Inadomi, JM
机构
[1] VA Ctr Practice Management & Outcomes Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Med Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-200220090-00001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Since gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a prevalent condition characterised by frequent relapses, long-term costs of management for this disease are high. Thus, strategies to decrease resource expenditures without impairing patient quality of life are desirable. On-demand therapy (one-dose when symptoms occur) and intermittent therapy (short course of medication when symptoms occur) are attractive since pharmaceutical expenditures may be decreased, and many patients self-employ this strategy. The purpose of this paper was to examine the economic implications of on-demand or intermittent therapy for GORD. A review of selected studies evaluating medication suitable for on-demand or intermittent administration was performed. A complete search for published studies on the cost effectiveness of on-demand or intermittent therapy for GORD was conducted, and the results discussed in detail. Antacids, alginates, topically active agents, histamine(2)-receptor antagonists, and proton pump inhibitors have all demonstrable efficacy compared with placebo when administered on-demand: Proton pump inhibitors constitute the most effective pharmacological means to treat GORD. Although step-up strategies initially using less potent medication may decrease resource use, cost-effectiveness analysis illustrates that on-demand or intermittent therapy with proton pump inhibitors may be reasonable options. Further work that defines quality of life and patient preferences associated with GORD may allow for proper allocation of resources for the management of this condition.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 576
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   In single doses ranitidine effervescent is more effective than lansoprazole in decreasing gastric acidity [J].
Arnestad, JS ;
Kleveland, PM ;
Waldum, HL .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1997, 11 (02) :355-358
[2]   Symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease:: double blind controlled study of intermittent treatment with omeprazole or ranitidine [J].
Bardhan, KD ;
Müller-Lissner, S ;
Bigard, MA ;
Porro, GB ;
Ponce, J ;
Hosie, J ;
Scott, M ;
Weir, DG ;
Gillon, KRW ;
Peacock, RA ;
Fulton, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 318 (7182) :502-+
[3]   The rise and rise of proton pump inhibitor drugs: Patients' perspectives [J].
Boath, EH ;
Blenkinsopp, A .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 45 (10) :1571-1579
[4]   SUCRALFATE VERSUS PLACEBO IN REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS - A DOUBLE-BLIND MULTICENTER STUDY [J].
CARLING, L ;
CRONSTEDT, J ;
ENGQVIST, A ;
KAGEVI, I ;
NYSTROM, B ;
SVEDBERG, LE ;
THORHALLSSON, E ;
UNGE, P ;
WINGREN, PE .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1988, 23 (09) :1117-1124
[5]   OMEPRAZOLE V RANITIDINE FOR PREVENTION OF RELAPSE IN REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS - A CONTROLLED DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF THEIR EFFICACY AND SAFETY [J].
DENT, J ;
YEOMANS, ND ;
MACKINNON, M ;
REED, W ;
NARIELVALA, FM ;
HETZEL, DJ ;
SOLCIA, E ;
SHEARMAN, DJC .
GUT, 1994, 35 (05) :590-598
[6]   The role of the specialist in the diagnosis and short and long term care of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease [J].
Dent, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 96 (08) :S22-S26
[7]  
*DEP HLTH, 1997, PRESCR COST AN
[8]  
Elm M, 1998, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V33, P900
[9]  
Faaij RA, 1999, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V13, P1605
[10]   On-demand treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms: a comparison of ranitidine 75 mg with cimetidine 200 mg or placebo [J].
Galmiche, JP ;
Shi, G ;
Simon, B ;
Casset-Semanaz, F ;
Slama, A .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1998, 12 (09) :909-917