Understanding customer reactions to brokered ultimatums: Applying negotiation and justice theory

被引:14
作者
Humphrey, SE
Ellis, APJ
Conlon, DE
Tinsley, CH
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Management, Eli Broad Grad Sch Management, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Management & Policy, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, McDonough Sch Business, Washington, DC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.466
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
There has been little research examining customer reactions to brokered ultimatum game (BUG) contexts (i.e., exchanges in which 1 party offers an ultimatum price for a resource through an intermediary, and the ultimatum offer is accepted or rejected by the other party). In this study, the authors incorporated rational decision-making theory and justice theory to examine how customers' bids, recommendations, and repatronage behavior are affected by characteristics of BUG contexts (changing from an ultimatum to negotiation transaction, response timeliness, and offer acceptance or rejection). Results indicated that customers attempt to be economically efficient with their bidding behavior. However, negotiation structures, long waits for a response, and rejected bids create injustice perceptions (particularly informational and distributive injustice), negatively influencing customers' recommendations to others and their repatronage. The authors then discuss the practical and theoretical implications of their results.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 482
页数:17
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]   Research in the psychological laboratory: Truth or triviality? [J].
Anderson, CA ;
Lindsay, AJ ;
Bushman, BJ .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 8 (01) :3-9
[3]  
Arbuckle J. L., 1997, AMOS USERS GUIDE VER
[4]   AN EVALUATION OF LEARNING IN THE BILATERAL WINNERS CURSE [J].
BALL, SB ;
BAZERMAN, MH ;
CARROLL, JS .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 48 (01) :1-22
[5]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[6]  
Bazerman M., 2006, JUDGMENT MANAGERIAL
[7]   Negotiation [J].
Bazerman, MH ;
Curhan, JR ;
Moore, DA ;
Valley, KL .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 51 :279-314
[8]  
Bentler P. M., 2006, EQS 6 structural equations program manual
[9]   EXTERNAL VALIDITY IS MORE THAN SKIN DEEP - SOME ANSWERS TO CRITICISMS OF LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS [J].
BERKOWITZ, L ;
DONNERSTEIN, E .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1982, 37 (03) :245-257
[10]  
Bies R.J., 1986, Research on negotiation in organizations, V1, P43, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1559-1816.2004.TB02581.X