Measurement of pain: The psychometric properties of the Pain-O-Meter, a simple, inexpensive pain assessment tool that could change health care practices

被引:102
作者
GastonJohansson, F
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ. Sch. of Nursing, Baltimore, MD
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ. Sch. of Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21205
关键词
pain assessment; pain measurement; Pain-O-Meter;
D O I
10.1016/0885-3924(96)00128-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
A self-administered pain assessment tool called the Pain-O-Meter (POM) was developed for the purposes of improving assessment and management of pain in acute and chronic pain patients. The POM is a hard, white, plastic tool that measures 8-in. long by 2-in. wide and 1-in. thick. Two methods for assessing pain are located on the POM. The first is a 10-cm visual analogue scab (POM-VAS) with a moveable marker that patients use to rate their pain. The second is a list of 15 sensory and 11 affective word descriptors (WDS). Each WDS is assigned an intensity value that can be as low as 1 or as high as 5. A pain intensity score is provided for the sensory and the affective WDSs. This psychometric study, which employed correlational and comparative designs, investigated the test-retest reliability and the concurrent and construct validity of the POM-VAS and the POM-WDS in 279 patients with acute or chronic pain. High correlations were found between initial and repeat pain intensity ratings on the POM-VAS (r = 0.88 P < 0.001) and POM-WDS (r + 0.84, P < 0.001) (test-retest reliability). Correlations between the POM-WDS and the McGill. Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) (r = 0.69, P < 0.001) and POM-VAS (r = 0.85, P < 0.001) supported the concurrent validity of the POM-WDS. Construct validity was also supported for the Pain-O-Meter by showing that pain scores decreased significantly for POM-WDS (t + 5.53 P < 0.001), and POM-VAS (t = 6.18, P < 0.001) after the patients were treated with pain medication. The use of a pain tool, such as the POM, could improve patient care by facilitating the documentation of pain and evaluation of pain relief measures.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 181
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
*AM PAIN SOC, 1989, PRINC AN US TREATM A
[2]  
Cleeland C S, 1985, Semin Oncol Nurs, V1, P87, DOI 10.1016/S0749-2081(85)80041-3
[3]  
CLEELAND CS, 1986, CANCER, V58, P796, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19860801)58:3<796::AID-CNCR2820580331>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-#
[5]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V2
[6]   DEVELOPMENT OF THE WISCONSIN BRIEF PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE TO ASSESS PAIN IN CANCER AND OTHER DISEASES [J].
DAUT, RL ;
CLEELAND, CS ;
FLANERY, RC .
PAIN, 1983, 17 (02) :197-210
[7]   REPRODUCIBILITY ALONG A 10-CM VERTICAL VISUAL ANALOG SCALE [J].
DIXON, JS ;
BIRD, HA .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1981, 40 (01) :87-89
[8]  
DONOVAN MI, 1987, CANCER NURS, V10, P85
[9]   STUDIES WITH PAIN RATING-SCALES [J].
DOWNIE, WW ;
LEATHAM, PA ;
RHIND, VM ;
WRIGHT, V ;
BRANCO, JA ;
ANDERSON, JA .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1978, 37 (04) :378-381
[10]   COMPARISON OF VERBAL AND VISUAL ANALOG SCALES FOR MEASURING THE INTENSITY AND UNPLEASANTNESS OF EXPERIMENTAL PAIN [J].
DUNCAN, GH ;
BUSHNELL, MC ;
LAVIGNE, GJ .
PAIN, 1989, 37 (03) :295-303