First personal modes of presentation and the structure of empathy

被引:15
作者
Paul, L. A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ St Andrews, Arche Res Ctr, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
来源
INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY | 2017年 / 60卷 / 03期
关键词
Metaphysics; de se; indexical; empathy; self; Lewis; Perry; Cappelen; Dever; TRANSFORMATIVE-EXPERIENCE; SELF-LOCATION; REPLIES;
D O I
10.1080/0020174X.2017.1261991
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
I argue that we can understand the de se by employing the subjective mode of presentation or, if one's ontology permits it, by defending an abundant ontology of perspectival personal properties or facts. I do this in the context of a discussion of Cappelen and Dever's recent criticisms of the de se. Then, I discuss the distinctive role of the first personal perspective in discussions about empathy, rational deference, and self-understanding, and develop a way to frame the problem of lacking prospective access to your future self as a problem with your capacity to imaginatively empathize with your (possible) future selves.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 207
页数:19
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THE SITUATED SELF
[2]   Self-projection and the brain [J].
Buckner, Randy L. ;
Carroll, Daniel C. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2007, 11 (02) :49-57
[3]   L. A. Paul's Transformative Experience [J].
Campbell, John .
PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 91 (03) :787-793
[4]  
Cappelen Herman., 2016, Context and Communication. Contemporary Introductions to Philosophy of Language
[5]   Secondary qualities and self-location [J].
Egan, Andy .
PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 72 (01) :97-119
[6]   A DEFENSE OF MORAL DEFERENCE [J].
Enoch, David .
JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2014, 111 (05) :229-258
[7]  
HARSANYI JC, 1977, SOC RES, V44, P623
[8]   Moral Testimony and Moral Epistemology [J].
Hills, Alison .
ETHICS, 2009, 120 (01) :94-127
[9]  
JACKSON F, 1982, PHILOS Q, V32, P27
[10]   Second-hand moral knowledge (Ethics, trust) [J].
Jones, K .
JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1999, 96 (02) :55-78