Neural network classification of tan spot and Stagonospora blotch infection periods in a wheat field environment

被引:38
作者
De Wolf, ED [1 ]
Francl, LJ [1 ]
机构
[1] N Dakota State Univ, Dept Plant Pathol, Fargo, ND 58105 USA
关键词
Phaeosphaeria avenaria; Phaeosphaeria nodorum; Pyrenophora tritici-repentis;
D O I
10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.2.108
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Tan spot and Stagonospora blotch of hard red spring wheat served as a model system for evaluating disease forecasts by artificial neural networks. Pathogen infection periods on susceptible wheat plants were measured in the field from 1993 to 1998, and incidence data were merged with 24-h summaries of accumulated growing degree days, temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, and leaf wetness duration. The resulting data set of 202 discrete periods was randomly assigned to 10 model-development or -validation (n = 50) data sets. Backpropagation neural networks, general regression neural networks, logistic regression, and parametric and nonparametric methods of discriminant analysis were chosen for comparison. Mean validation classification of tan spot incidence was between 71% for logistic regression and 76% for backpropagation models. No significant difference was found between methods of modeling tan spot infection periods. Mean validation prediction accuracy of Stagonospora blotch incidence was 86 and 81% for backpropagation and logistic regression, respectively. Prediction accuracies of other modeling methods were less than or equal to 78% and were significantly different (P = 0.01) from backpropagation, but not logistic regression, results. The best back-propagation models of tan spot and Stagonospora blotch incidences correctly classified 82 and 84% of validation cases, respectively. High classification accuracy and consistently good performance demonstrate the applicability of neural network technology to plant disease forecasting.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 113
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Batchelor WD, 1997, T ASAE, V40, P247, DOI 10.13031/2013.21237
[2]  
BAUER A, 1984, ND STATE U COOP EXP, V37
[3]  
Bishop C. M., 1995, NEURAL NETWORKS PATT
[4]  
Bockus W. W., 1992, Journal of Applied Seed Production, V10, P1
[5]   Moisture prediction from simple micrometeorological data [J].
Chtioui, Y ;
Francl, LJ ;
Panigrahi, S .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1999, 89 (08) :668-672
[6]   A generalized regression neural network and its application for leaf wetness prediction to forecast plant disease [J].
Chtioui, Y ;
Panigrahi, S ;
Francl, L .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1999, 48 (01) :47-58
[7]   Neural networks that distinguish infection periods of wheat tan spot in an outdoor environment [J].
DeWolf, ED ;
Francl, LJ .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1997, 87 (01) :83-87
[8]   Artificial neural network models of wheat leaf wetness [J].
Francl, LJ ;
Panigrahi, S .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1997, 88 (1-4) :57-65
[9]   Local and mesodistance dispersal of Pyrenophora tritici-repentis conidia [J].
Francl, LJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PHYTOPATHOLOGIE, 1997, 19 (03) :247-255
[10]   CHALLENGE OF BIOASSAY PLANTS IN A MONITORED OUTDOOR ENVIRONMENT [J].
FRANCL, LJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PHYTOPATHOLOGIE, 1995, 17 (02) :138-143