Patient-physician concordance: Preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision

被引:246
作者
Lanz, NK
Wren, PA
Copeland, LA
Lowery, JC
Goldfarb, SL
Wilkins, EG
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Educ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Hlth Syst, Taubman Ctr, Dept Plast Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Hlth Syst, Dept Vet Affairs Med Ctr Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2004.09.069
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose This study explored patient preferences for involvement in the breast cancer treatment decision and concordance between patients' and physicians' views on decisional role. The impact of demographic and psychosocial characteristics on patients' decisional role was also examined. Patients and Methods Women with stage I or 11 breast cancer who were candidates for either mastectomy or lumpectomy were recruited from a university breast cancer treatment center. Patient interviews were obtained before meeting the surgical oncologist and again after the treatment decision was made but before surgical intervention. Clinician responses were obtained after the consultation. Results The 101 participants were generally white (97%), married (80%), and well-educated. They reported moderate levels of depression and anxiety but good social support and self-efficacy in communicating with their physician. Before the consultation, 47% of women reported a preference for shared decision making; afterwards, 61% felt they had primary responsibility for the decision. Only 38% of patients agreed with the physician's assessment of how the treatment decision was made. In regression analyses, higher education was significantly associated with patients' preferred level of control (P = .01). There was a trend toward women with greater self-efficacy desiring more active decisional roles (P = .08). Patient preference for decision making did not impact time in the patient-physician encounter, but more influence did increase satisfaction. Conclusion Limited concordance between patient preference and patient perception and between patient and physician perception in how the treatment decision was made suggests the need for better communication between patient and clinician during a critical treatment encounter for breast cancer patients. (C) 2004 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:3091 / 3098
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BR J SURG
[2]   Patient preferences for medical decision making - Who really wants to participate? [J].
Arora, NK ;
McHorney, CA .
MEDICAL CARE, 2000, 38 (03) :335-341
[3]  
ASHCROFT JJ, 1985, J ROY SOC MED, V78, P43
[4]   Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: A review of published surveys [J].
Benbassat, J ;
Pilpel, D ;
Tidhar, M .
BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1998, 24 (02) :81-88
[5]  
Bilodeau B A, 1996, Oncol Nurs Forum, V23, P691
[6]   PATIENT PERCEPTION OF INVOLVEMENT IN MEDICAL-CARE - RELATIONSHIP TO ILLNESS ATTITUDES AND OUTCOMES [J].
BRODY, DS ;
MILLER, SM ;
LERMAN, CE ;
SMITH, DG ;
CAPUTO, GC .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 4 (06) :506-511
[7]   Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care [J].
Bruera, E ;
Sweeney, C ;
Calder, K ;
Palmer, L ;
Benisch-Tolley, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (11) :2883-2885
[8]   Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692
[9]  
Davis Ruth E, 2003, Health Expect, V6, P198, DOI 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00235.x
[10]   Taking responsibility for cancer treatment [J].
Deadman, JM ;
Leinster, SJ ;
Owens, RG ;
Dewey, ME ;
Slade, PD .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2001, 53 (05) :669-677