A case devoid of bias:: Optical Redshift Survey voids versus IRAS voids

We present a comparison between the voids in two nearly all-sky redshift surveys: the Optical Redshift Survey (ORS) and the IRAS 1.2-Jy survey. While the galaxies in these surveys are selected differently and their populations are known to be biased relative to each other, the two void distributions are similar. We compare the spatial distribution of the two void populations and demonstrate the correlation between them. The voids also agree with regard to the overall void statistics - a filling factor of approximate to 0.45 of the volume, an average void diameter (d) over bar(void)approximate to 45 h(-1) Mpc and an average galaxy underdensity in the voids <(delta)over bar>approximate to-0.9. Our measurements of the underdensities of the voids in the two surveys enable us to estimate the relative bias in the voids between optical and IRAS samples. We find (b(opt)/b(IRAS))(void)approximate to 1, showing that on average there is little - or no - biasing between the two void populations.