Chemical predator inspection in a characin fish (Hemigrammus erythrozonus, characidae, ostariophysi):: The effects of mixed predator diets

被引:11
作者
Brown, GE
Zachar, MM
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Biol, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
[2] Union Coll, Sci & Engn Ctr, Dept Biol Sci, Schenectady, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00784.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Many prey organisms will approach (inspect) potential predators, primarily to assess local risk of predation. It has been demonstrated that Ostariphysan prey fishes can detect conspecific alarm pheromones in the diet of potential predators and use this chemical information to reduce their risk of predation while still gaining significant benefits associated with predator inspection. We conducted the current study to examine the possible effects of mixed diets on the use of these chemical predator diet cues during inspection visits. Shoals of four glowlight tetras (Hemigrammus erythrozonus)were exposed to Jack Dempsey cichlids (Cichlasoma octofaciatum) which had been fed diets consisting of: 100% tetras (with alarm pheromone); 75% tetra, 25% swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri. which lack a recognizable alarm pheromone); 25% tetra, 75% swordtail; or 100% swordtails. Tetras significantly increased their anti-predator behaviour in response to predators fed 100% tetra or the two mixed predator diets, but not when exposed to predators fed a 100% swordtail diet. Likewise, we observed significant differences in inspection behaviour. Tetras took longer to initiate an inspection, inspected in smaller groups and directed a greater proportion of inspection visits towards the tail region of the predator when it had been fed 100% tetra or either of the two mixed prey diets. We found no significant differences in either anti-predator or inspection behaviour among the three diet treatments containing tetras. These data strongly suggest that glowlight tetras are capable of detecting relatively small amounts of conspecific alarm pheromone in the diet of potential predators and that they modify their behaviour based on the presence or absence of these cues.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 461
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Statistical Tables
[2]  
[Anonymous], CICHLIDS WORLD
[3]  
AXELROD HR, 1993, MOST COMPLETE LEXICO
[4]  
AXELROD HR, 1983, ENCY TROPICAL FISHES
[5]   Foraging trade-offs and predator inspection in an Ostariophysan fish: Switching from chemical to visual cues [J].
Brown, GE ;
Cowan, J .
BEHAVIOUR, 2000, 137 :181-195
[6]   Who dares, learns: chemical inspection behaviour and acquired predator recognition in a characin fish [J].
Brown, GE ;
Godin, JGJ .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1999, 57 :475-481
[7]   Fin-flicking behaviour:: a visual antipredator alarm signal in a characin fish, Hemigrammus erythrozonus [J].
Brown, GE ;
Godin, JGJ ;
Pedersen, J .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1999, 58 :469-475
[8]   Chemical alarm signals in wild Trinidadian gunnies (Poecilia reticulata) [J].
Brown, GE ;
Godin, JGJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1999, 77 (04) :562-570
[9]   Chemically mediated predator inspection behaviour in the absence of predator visual cues by a characin fish [J].
Brown, GE ;
Paige, JA ;
Godin, JGJ .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2000, 60 :315-321
[10]   Anti-predator responses to conspecific and heterospecific skin extracts by threespine sticklebacks: Alarm pheromones revisited [J].
Brown, GE ;
Godin, JGJ .
BEHAVIOUR, 1997, 134 :1123-1134