Using detailed maps of science to identify potential collaborations

被引:48
作者
Boyack, Kevin W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sandia Natl Labs, Albuquerque, NM 87185 USA
[2] SciTech Strategies Inc, Albuquerque, NM 87122 USA
关键词
Sandia National Laboratory; Bibliographic Coupling; Paper Level; Potential Collaboration; Future Collaboration;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-009-0402-6
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Research on the effects of collaboration in scientific research has been increasing in recent years. A variety of studies have been done at the institution and country level, many with an eye toward policy implications. However, the question of how to identify the most fruitful targets for future collaboration in high-performing areas of science has not been addressed. This paper presents a method for identifying targets for future collaboration between two institutions. The utility of the method is shown in two different applications: identifying specific potential collaborations at the author level between two institutions, and generating an index that can be used for strategic planning purposes. Identification of these potential collaborations is based on finding authors that belong to the same small paper-level community (or cluster of papers), using a map of science and technology containing nearly 1 million papers organized into 117,435 communities. The map used here is also unique in that it is the first map to combine the ISI Proceedings database with the Science and Social Science Indexes at the paper level.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 44
页数:18
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Visualizing knowledge domains
    Börner, K
    Chen, CM
    Boyack, KW
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 : 179 - 255
  • [2] Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry research
    Boyack, Kevin W.
    Boerner, Katy
    Klavans, Richard
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2009, 79 (01) : 45 - 60
  • [3] Mapping the backbone of science
    Boyack, KW
    Klavans, R
    Börner, K
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2005, 64 (03) : 351 - 374
  • [4] Double effort = Double impact?: A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry
    Glänzel, W
    Schubert, A
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2001, 50 (02) : 199 - 214
  • [5] Proceedings literature as additional data source for bibliometric analysis
    Glanzel, Wolfgang
    Schlemmer, Balazs
    Schubert, Andras
    Thijs, Bart
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, 68 (03) : 457 - 473
  • [6] Havemann Frank, 2006, J Biomed Discov Collab, V1, P6, DOI 10.1186/1747-5333-1-6
  • [7] Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science
    Klavans, R
    Boyack, KW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 57 (02): : 251 - 263
  • [8] Thought leadership: A new indicator for national and institutional comparison
    Klavans, Richard
    Boyack, Kevin W.
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, 75 (02) : 239 - 250
  • [9] Quantitative evaluation of large maps of science
    Klavans, Richard
    Boyack, Kevin W.
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, 68 (03) : 475 - 499
  • [10] Studying research collaboration using co-authorships
    Melin, G
    Persson, O
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 1996, 36 (03) : 363 - 377