Single-breath inhalation induction of sevoflurane anaesthesia with and without nitrous oxide: A feasibility study in adults and comparison with an intravenous bolus of propofol

被引:83
作者
Hall, JE
Stewart, JIM
Harmer, M
机构
[1] Dept. Anaesth. Intensive Care Med., University of Wales, College of Medicine, Cardiff CF4 4XN, Heath Park
关键词
anaesthesia; induction; anaesthetic; volatile; sevoflurane; intravenous; propofol;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.091-az0086.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The induction characteristics of sevoflurane in nitrous oxide and oxygen were compared with sevoflurane in oxygen alone and a propofol infusion. A vital capacity technique was used for the us induction groups using a Mapleson A system and a 4-litre reservoir bag. Four end-points of anaesthesia were recorded: time to cessation of finger tapping, time to loss of eyelash reflex, time to jaw relaxation and time to regular settled breathing after laryngeal mask airway insertion. We also recorded sequential blood pressure and pulse rate, the incidence of adverse airway events and the acceptability of the induction technique. Propofol had a faster time to cessation of finger tapping (p < 0.05) and jaw relaxation (p < 0.01). These differences disappeared with the final induction stage and sevoflurane in nitrous oxide and oxygen had the faster time to regular settled breathing, though this did not reach statistical significance. Cardiovascular stability was good and comparable in all groups. There were few adverse airway events in any group and none caused oxygen saturation to fall below 96%. There tvas more excitation in the gaseous induction groups, though this did not interfere with induction. Patient satisfaction with induction was high.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 415
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   GENERAL ANAESTHESIA FOR OUT-PATIENTS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO DENTAL EXTRACTION [J].
BOURNE, JG .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE-LONDON, 1954, 47 (06) :416-422
[2]  
DION P, 1992, CANADIAN J ANAESTHES, V39, P663
[3]  
HORNBEIN TF, 1969, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V31, P250
[4]   COMPARISON BETWEEN SEVOFLURANE AND HALOTHANE FOR PEDIATRIC AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA [J].
NAITO, Y ;
TAMAI, S ;
SHINGU, K ;
FUJIMORI, R ;
MORI, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 67 (04) :387-389
[5]  
PIAT V, 1994, ANESTH ANALG, V79, P840
[6]   COMPARISON OF RAPID AND CONVENTIONAL INHALATION INDUCTIONS OF HALOTHANE OXYGEN ANESTHESIA IN HEALTHY-MEN AND WOMEN [J].
RUFFLE, JM ;
SNIDER, MT .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1987, 67 (04) :584-587
[7]   RAPID INDUCTION OF HALOTHANE ANESTHESIA IN MAN [J].
RUFFLE, JM ;
SNIDER, MT ;
ROSENBERGER, JL ;
LATTA, WB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1985, 57 (06) :607-611
[8]   Sevoflurane versus isoflurane: Induction and recovery characteristics with single-breath inhaled inductions of anesthesia [J].
Sloan, MH ;
Conard, PF ;
Karsunky, PK ;
Gross, JB .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (03) :528-532
[9]   COMPARISON OF INDUCTION, MAINTENANCE, AND RECOVERY CHARACTERISTICS OF SEVOFLURANE-N2O AND PROPOFOL-SEVOFLURANE-N2O WITH PROPOFOL-ISOFLURANE-N2O ANESTHESIA [J].
SMITH, I ;
DING, YF ;
WHITE, PF .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1992, 74 (02) :253-259
[10]   SINGLE BREATH INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA, USING A VITAL CAPACITY BREATH OF HALOTHANE, NITROUS-OXIDE AND OXYGEN [J].
WILTON, NCT ;
THOMAS, VL .
ANAESTHESIA, 1986, 41 (05) :472-476