Concordance of the composite international diagnostic interview version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) with standardized clinical assessments in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys

被引:902
作者
Haro, Josep Maria
Arbabzadeh-Bouchez, Saena
Brugha, Traolach S.
De Girolamo, Giovanni
Guyer, Margaret E.
Jin, Robert
Lepine, Jean Pierre
Mazzi, Fausto
Reneses, Blanca
Vilagut, Gemma
Sampson, Nancy A.
Kessler, Ronald C.
机构
[1] Fundacio St Joan de Deu Recerca & Docencia, Esplugas de Llobregat 08950, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Hop Fernand Widal, Paris, France
[3] Univ Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
[4] AUSL, Bologna, Italy
[5] Massachusetts Mental Hlth Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Univ Modena, I-41100 Modena, Italy
[8] Hosp Clin San Carlos, Dept Psychiat, Madrid, Spain
[9] Inst Municipal Invest Med, Hlth Serv Res Unit, E-08003 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI); validity; WHO World Mental Health; (WMH) Survey Initiative;
D O I
10.1002/mpr.196
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The DSM-IV diagnoses generated by the fully structured lay-administered Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) in the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys were compared to diagnoses based on followup interviews with the clinician-administered non-patient edition of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) in probability subsamples of the WMH surveys in France, Italy, Spain, and the US. CIDI cases were oversampled. The clinical reappraisal samples were weighted to adjust for this oversampling. Separate samples were assessed for lifetime and 12-month prevalence. Moderate to good individual-level CIDI-SCID concordance was found for lifetime prevalence estimates of most disorders. The area under the ROC curve (AUC, a measure of classification accuracy that is not influenced by disorder prevalence) was 0.76 for the dichotomous classification of having any of the lifetime DSM-IV anxiety, mood and substance disorders assessed in the surveys and in the range 0.62-0.93 for individual disorders, with an inter-quartile range (IQR) of 0.71-0.86. Concordance increased when CIDI symptom-level data were added to predict SCID diagnoses in logistic regression equations. AUC for individual disorders in these equations was in the range 0.74-0.99, with an IQR of 0.87-0.96. CIDI lifetime prevalence estimates were generally conservative relative to SCID estimates. CIDI-SCID concordance for 12-month prevalence estimates could be studied powerfully only for two disorder classes, any anxiety disorder (AUC = 0.88) and any mood disorder (AUC = 0.83). As with lifetime prevalence, 12-month concordance,, improved when CIDI symptom-level data were added to predict SCID diagnoses. CIDI 12-month prevalence estimates were unbiased relative to SCID estimates. The validity of the CIDI is likely to be under-estimated in these comparisons due to the fact that the reliability of the SCID diagnoses, which is presumably less than perfect, sets a ceiling on maximum CIDI-SCID concordance. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 180
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
AGRESTI A., 2019, INTRO CATEGORICAL DA
[2]  
Alonso J, 2004, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V109, P8
[3]   A COMPARISON OF 2 STRUCTURED DIAGNOSTIC INTERVIEWS - CIDI AND SCAN [J].
ANDREWS, G ;
PETERS, L ;
GUZMAN, AM ;
BIRD, K .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1995, 29 (01) :124-132
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, INT J METH PSYCH RES, DOI [DOI 10.1002/MPR.33, 10.1002/mpr.33]
[5]   Diagnosing depression in the medically ill: validity of a lay-administered structured diagnostic interview [J].
Booth, BM ;
Kirchner, JE ;
Hamilton, G ;
Harrell, R ;
Smith, GR .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (06) :353-360
[6]  
BROMET EJ, 1986, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V43, P435
[7]   The end of the beginning: a requiem for the categorization of mental disorder? [J].
Brugha, TS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2002, 32 (07) :1149-1154
[8]   A general population comparison of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) [J].
Brugha, TS ;
Jenkins, R ;
Taub, N ;
Meltzer, H ;
Bebbington, PE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2001, 31 (06) :1001-1013
[9]   BIAS, PREVALENCE AND KAPPA [J].
BYRT, T ;
BISHOP, J ;
CARLIN, JB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 46 (05) :423-429
[10]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46