A nationwide study of decisions to forego life-prolonging treatment in Dutch medical practice

被引:35
作者
Groenewoud, JH
van der Heide, A
Kester, JGC
de Graaff, CLM
van der Wal, G
van der Maas, PJ
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Stat Netherlands, Voorburg, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Res Extramural Med, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Social Med, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.160.3.357
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Decisions to withhold or withdraw life-prolonging treatment in terminally ill patients are common in some areas of medical practice. Information about the frequency and background of these decisions is generally limited to specific clinical settings. This article describes the practice of withholding or withdrawing life-prolonging treatment in the Netherlands. Methods: Questionnaires were sent to the attending physicians of a stratified sample of 6060 of all 43 002 cases of death in the Netherlands from August 1 through November 30, 1995. The questions concerned the treatments foregone, the patient characteristics, and the decision-making process. The response rate was 77%. Results: A nontreatment decision was made in 30% (95% confidence interval, 28%-31%) of all deaths in the Netherlands in 1995; this is an increase compared with 28% (95% confidence interval, 26%-29%) in 1990; in 20% of all deaths, this decision was the most important end-of-life decision. Artificial nutrition or hydration and antibiotics were the treatments most frequently foregone, each accounting for 25% of cases in which a nontreatment decision was made. Nursing-home physicians withheld or withdrew treatment more often than clinical specialists or general practitioners in 52%, 35%, and 17% of all deaths they were involved with, respectively. Of the patients in whom a nontreatment decision was the most important end-of-life decision, 26% were competent; of those, 93% were involved in the decision making. In 17% of patients, the nontreatment decision was made without being discussed with the patient or the patient's relatives and without knowledge of the patient's wishes. Life was shortened by an estimated 24 hours or less in 42% and 1 month or more in 8%, of patients. Conclusions: Decisions to forego life-prolonging treatment are frequently made end-of-life decisions in the Netherlands and may be increasing. Most of these decisions do not involve high-technology treatments, and the consequences, in terms of shortening of life, are relatively small.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 363
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Why do physicians prefer to withdraw some forms of life support over others? Intrinsic attributes of life-sustaining treatments are associated with physicians' preferences [J].
Asch, DA ;
Christakis, NA .
MEDICAL CARE, 1996, 34 (02) :103-111
[2]   DECISIONS TO LIMIT OR CONTINUE LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT BY CRITICAL CARE PHYSICIANS IN THE UNITED-STATES - CONFLICTS BETWEEN PHYSICIANS PRACTICES AND PATIENTS WISHES [J].
ASCH, DA ;
HANSENFLASCHEN, J ;
LANKEN, PN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1995, 151 (02) :288-292
[3]  
*CTR BUR STAT, 1997, STAT JB
[4]   A multi-institutional study of care given to patients dying in hospitals - Ethical and practice implications [J].
FaberLangendoen, K .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 156 (18) :2130-2136
[5]   PROCESS OF FORGOING LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT IN A UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL - AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY [J].
FABERLANGENDOEN, K ;
BARTELS, DM .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1992, 20 (05) :570-577
[6]   MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING IN THE LAST 6 MONTHS OF LIFE - CHOICES ABOUT LIMITATION OF CARE [J].
FRIED, TR ;
GILLICK, MR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1994, 42 (03) :303-307
[7]   IMPACT OF PATIENT INCOMPETENCE ON DECISIONS TO USE OR WITHHOLD LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT [J].
HANSON, LC ;
DANIS, M ;
MUTRAN, E ;
KEENAN, NL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 97 (03) :235-241
[8]   Who decides? Physicians' willingness to use life-sustaining treatment [J].
Hanson, LC ;
Danis, M ;
Garrett, JM ;
Mutran, E .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 156 (07) :785-789
[9]   A retrospective review of a large cohort of patients undergoing the process of withholding or withdrawal of life support [J].
Keenan, SP ;
Busche, KD ;
Chen, LM ;
McCarthy, L ;
Inman, KJ ;
Sibbald, WJ .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (08) :1324-1331
[10]   WITHDRAWAL OR WITHHOLDING OF TREATMENT AT THE END OF LIFE - RESULTS OF A NATIONWIDE STUDY [J].
PIJNENBORG, L ;
van der Maas, PJ ;
KARDAUN, JWPF ;
GLERUM, JJ ;
VANDELDEN, JJM ;
LOOMAN, CWN .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 155 (03) :286-292