Extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total hip replacement -: A comparison of low-molecular weight heparin with oral anticoagulant

被引:81
作者
Samama, CM
Vray, M
Barré, J
Fiessinger, JN
Rosencher, N
Lecompte, T
Potron, G
Basile, J
Hull, R
Desmichels, D
机构
[1] Univ Paris 13, CHU Avicenne, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Dept Anesthesie Reanimat, Bobigny, France
[2] Hop Paul Brousse, INSERM SC4, Serv Malad Infect, Villejuif, France
[3] CHU Robert Debre, Dept Anesethesie Reanimat, Reims, France
[4] Hop Europeen Georges Pompidou, Serv Med Vasc, Paris, France
[5] CHU Cochin, Dept Anesthesie Reanimat, Paris, France
[6] CHU Reg Nancy, Hematol Lab, Nancy, France
[7] CHU Robert Debre, Hematol Lab, Reims, France
[8] Polyclin Chirurg, St Georges De Didonne, France
[9] Univ Calgary, Thrombosis Res Unit, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[10] Knoll France, Levallois Perret, France
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.162.19.2191
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Oral anticoagulants and low-molecular-weight heparin are both recommended for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total hip replacement. To date; these regimens have not been compared by means of clinical end points in the extended prophylaxis setting. Methods: We randomly assigned 1279 patients 3 days after total hip replacement surgery to fixed-dose subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (reviparin sodium, 4200 anti-Xa IU) or adjusted-dose oral anticoagulant (international normalized ratio, 2-3; acenocoumarol) for a 6-week period. The primary end point was the failure rate, defined as the combined clinical events of a confirmed symptomatic thromboembolic event, a major hemorrhage, or death. All patients were followed up throughout the study interval. The primary objective was to compare the observed cumulative failure rate in the low-molecular-weight heparin vs oral anticoagulant group. Results: In the intent-to-treat population, objectively documented symptomatic thromboembolic events occurred in 15 (2.3%) of 643 patients vs 21 (3.3%) of 636 patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin or oral anticoagulants, respectively (P = .30; 95% confidence interval for the difference, -0.8% to 2.8%). Major bleeding occurred in 9 (1.4%) of 643 patients vs 35 (5.5%) of 636 patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin or oral anticoagulants, respectively (P = .001). The failure rate was 24 (3.7%) of 643 patients compared with 53 (8.3%) of 636 patients who received low-molecular-weight heparin or oral anticoagulants (P = .001). Conclusions: A significantly higher benefit-risk ratio was observed for patients undergoing elective hip replacement who received extended out-of-hospital prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin vs acenocoumarol. Low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis was at least as effective as oral anticoagulants, but with a marked improvement in safety.
引用
收藏
页码:2191 / 2196
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement [J].
Bergqvist, D ;
Benoni, G ;
Bjorgell, O ;
Fredin, H ;
Hedlundh, U ;
Nicolas, S ;
Nilsson, P ;
Nylander, G .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (10) :696-700
[2]   Comparison of enoxaparin and warfarin for the prevention of venous thromboembolic disease after total hip arthroplasty - Evaluation during hospitalization and three months after discharge [J].
Colwell, CW ;
Collis, DK ;
Paulson, R ;
McCutchen, JW ;
Bigler, GT ;
Lutz, S ;
Hardwick, ME .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 81A (07) :932-940
[3]  
Dahl OE, 1997, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V77, P26
[4]   Prevention of venous thromboembolism [J].
Geerts, WH ;
Heit, JA ;
Clagett, GP ;
Pineo, GF ;
Colwell, CW ;
Anderson, FA ;
Wheeler, HB .
CHEST, 2001, 119 (01) :132S-175S
[5]   Low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis using dalteparin in close proximity to surgery vs warfarin in hip arthroplasty patients -: A double-blind, randomized comparison [J].
Hull, RD ;
Pineo, GF ;
Francis, C ;
Bergqvist, D ;
Fellenius, C ;
Soderberg, K ;
Holmqvist, A ;
Mant, M ;
Dear, R ;
Baylis, B ;
Mah, A ;
Brant, R .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (14) :2199-2207
[6]   Low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis using dalteparin extended out-of-hospital vs in-hospital warfarin/out-of-hospital placebo in hip arthroplasty patients -: A double-blind, randomized comparison [J].
Hull, RD ;
Pineo, GF ;
Francis, C ;
Bergqvist, D ;
Fellenius, C ;
Soderberg, K ;
Holmqvist, A ;
Mant, M ;
Dear, R ;
Baylis, B ;
Mah, A ;
Brant, R .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (14) :2208-2215
[7]   Efficacy and safety of prolonged thromboprophylaxis with a low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin) after total hip arthroplasty - The Danish prolonged prophylaxis (DaPP) study [J].
Lassen, MR ;
Borris, LC ;
Anderson, BS ;
Jensen, HP ;
Bro, HPS ;
Andersen, G ;
Petersen, AO ;
Siem, P ;
Horlyck, E ;
Jensen, BV ;
Thomsen, PB ;
Hansen, BR ;
Erin-Madsen, J ;
Moller, JC ;
Rotwitt, L ;
Christensen, F ;
Nielsen, JB ;
Jorgensen, PS ;
Paaske, B ;
Torholm, C ;
Hvidt, P ;
Jensen, NK ;
Nielsen, AB ;
Appelquist, E ;
Hansen, OG ;
Mortensen, D ;
Tjalve, E .
THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 1998, 89 (06) :281-287
[8]   LOW-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN IN PREVENTION OF PERIOPERATIVE THROMBOSIS [J].
LEIZOROVICZ, A ;
HAUGH, MC ;
CHAPUIS, FR ;
SAMAMA, MM ;
BOISSEL, JP .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6859) :913-920
[9]   PREVENTION OF DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS AFTER ELECTIVE HIP-SURGERY - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING LOW-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN WITH STANDARD UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN [J].
LEVINE, MN ;
HIRSH, J ;
GENT, M ;
TURPIE, AG ;
LECLERC, J ;
POWERS, PJ ;
JAY, RM ;
NEEMEH, J .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1991, 114 (07) :545-551
[10]  
Nicolaides AN, 1997, INT ANGIOL, V16, P3