Immunohistochemical characterization of signet-ring cell carcinomas of the stomach, breast, and colon

被引:145
作者
Chu, PG [1 ]
Weiss, LM [1 ]
机构
[1] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Div Pathol, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
关键词
signet-ring cell carcinoma; hepatocyte paraffin 1; intestinal metaplasia; immunohistochemistry;
D O I
10.1309/A09ERYMFR64NERDW
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
We studied the immunophenotype of signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) of the stomach (30 cases), breast (21 cases), and colon (9 cases) with the following expression patterns: (1) breast: consistent, MUC1 (21 [100%]), cytokeratin (CK) 7 (20 [95%]), estrogen receptor (ER; 17 [81%]); infrequent, E-cadherin (6 [29%]), MUC2, MUC5AC, CK20 (1 [5%] each); negative, CDX2 and hepatocyte paraffin I (Hep Par 1; 0 [0%] each); (2) gastric: frequent, CDX2 (2 7 [90%]) and Hep Par 1 (25 [83%]); variable, E-cadherin and CK20 (17 [57%] each), MUC2 and MUC5AC (15 [50%] each), MUC1 (5 [17%]); negative, ER (0 [0%]); and (3) colon:frequent, MUC2 (9 [100%]), CDX2 and MUC5AC (8 [89%] each); infrequent or negative, MUC1 (3 [33%]), Hep Par 1 (2 [22%]), ER (0 [0%]). Immunohistochemical staining distinguished breast from gastric SRCC (ER, MUC1, Hep Par 1, CDX2) and colon SRCC (ER, CDX2, MUC2, and MUC5AC). Gastric and colon SRCCs showed a similar staining pattern for antibodies tested except for Hep Par 1 and CDX2 (gastric, 83% Hep Par 1 positivity and heterogeneous, weak, patchy CDX2 nuclear staining; colon, 22% Hep Par 1 positivity and homogeneous, strong, diffuse CDX2 nuclear staining). About half of the cases of gastric SRCC expressed MUC2 and MUC5AC, whereas virtually all cases of colon SRCC expressed them.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 892
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Significance of MUC1 and MUC2 mucin expression in colorectal cancer [J].
Ajioka, Y ;
Allison, LJ ;
Jass, JR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1996, 49 (07) :560-564
[2]   Cooperative role of E-cadherin and sialyl-Lewis X/A-deficient MUC1 in the passive dissemination of tumor emboli in inflammatory breast carcinoma [J].
Alpaugh, ML ;
Tomlinson, JS ;
Kasraeian, S ;
Barsky, SH .
ONCOGENE, 2002, 21 (22) :3631-3643
[3]  
AMORN Y, 1978, CANCER, V41, P2420, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197806)41:6<2420::AID-CNCR2820410648>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-L
[5]  
ANTONIOLI DA, 1982, CANCER, V50, P775, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19820815)50:4<775::AID-CNCR2820500425>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-W
[7]   Comparative evaluation of the prognostic value of MUC1, MUC2, sialyl-Lewisa and sialyl-Lewisx antigens in colorectal adenocarcinoma [J].
Baldus, SE ;
Mönig, SP ;
Hanisch, FG ;
Zirbes, TK ;
Flucke, U ;
Oelert, S ;
Zilkens, G ;
Madejczik, B ;
Thiele, J ;
Schneider, PM ;
Hölscher, AH ;
Dienes, HP .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2002, 40 (05) :440-449
[8]   Immunohistochemical staining patterns of MUC1, MUC2, MUC4, and MUC5AC mucins in hyperplastic polyps, serrated adenomas, and traditional adenomas of the colorectum [J].
Biemer-Hüttmann, AE ;
Walsh, MD ;
McGuckin, MA ;
Ajioka, Y ;
Watanabe, H ;
Leggett, BA ;
Jass, JR .
JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 1999, 47 (08) :1039-1047
[9]  
BORST MJ, 1993, SURGERY, V114, P637
[10]  
CAMERON BL, 1992, AM SURGEON, V58, P758