Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer Care in the United States Based on Formally Developed Quality Indicators

被引:102
作者
Bilimoria, Karl Y. [1 ,2 ]
Bentrem, David J. [2 ]
Lillemoe, Keith D. [3 ]
Talamonti, Mark S. [2 ,4 ]
Ko, Clifford Y. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Amer Coll Surg, Canc Programs, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Surg, Indianapolis, IN USA
[4] NorthShore Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Evanston, IL USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[6] VA Greater Angeles Healthcare Syst, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2009年 / 101卷 / 12期
关键词
NEW-YORK-STATE; HOSPITAL VOLUME; OF-CARE; UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES; SURGICAL MORTALITY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; CARDIAC-SURGERY; HEALTH-CARE; RESECTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djp107
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Pancreatic cancer outcomes vary considerably among hospitals. Assessing pancreatic cancer care by using quality indicators could help reduce this variability. However, valid quality indicators are not currently available for pancreatic cancer management, and a composite assessment of the quality of pancreatic cancer care in the United States has not been done. Potential quality indicators were identified from the literature, consensus guidelines, and interviews with experts. A panel of 20 pancreatic cancer experts ranked potential quality indicators for validity based on the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology. The rankings were rated as valid (high or moderate validity) or not valid. Adherence with valid indicators at both the patient and the hospital levels and a composite measure of adherence at the hospital level were assessed using data from the National Cancer Data Base (2004-2005) for 49 065 patients treated at 1134 hospitals. Summary statistics were calculated for each individual candidate quality indicator to assess the median ranking and distribution. Of the 50 potential quality indicators identified, 43 were rated as valid (29 as high and 14 as moderate validity). Of the 43 valid indicators, 11 (25.6%) assessed structural factors, 19 (44.2%) assessed clinical processes of care, four (9.3%) assessed treatment appropriateness, four (9.3%) assessed efficiency, and five (11.6%) assessed outcomes. Patient-level adherence with individual indicators ranged from 49.6% to 97.2%, whereas hospital-level adherence with individual indicators ranged from 6.8% to 99.9%. Of the 10 component indicators (contributing 1 point each) that were used to develop the composite score, most hospitals were adherent with fewer than half of the indicators (median score = 4; interquartile range = 3-5). Based on the quality indicators developed in this study, there is considerable variability in the quality of pancreatic cancer care in the United States. Hospitals can use these indicators to evaluate the pancreatic cancer care they provide and to identify potential quality improvement opportunities.
引用
收藏
页码:848 / 859
页数:12
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
*AG HEALTHC RES QU, QUAL IND
[2]  
American Hospital Association, QUAL PAT SAF
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, AJCC CANC STAGING MA
[4]  
[Anonymous], FAC ONC REG DAT STAN
[5]  
[Anonymous], PERF MEAS
[6]   Impact of the New York State Cardiac Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System on the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock [J].
Apolito, Renato A. ;
Greenberg, Mark A. ;
Menegus, Mark A. ;
Lowe, April M. ;
Sleeper, Lynn A. ;
Goldberger, Mark H. ;
Remick, Joshua ;
Radford, Martha J. ;
Hochman, Judith S. .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 155 (02) :267-273
[7]   Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery [J].
Begg, CB ;
Cramer, LD ;
Hoskins, WJ ;
Brennan, MF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (20) :1747-1751
[8]   Outcomes in oncologic surgery: Does volume make a difference? [J].
Bentrem, DJ ;
Brennan, MF .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 29 (10) :1210-1216
[9]   Effect of Hospital Volume on Margin Status after Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Cancer [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Talamonti, Mark S. ;
Sener, Stephen F. ;
Bilimoria, Malcolm M. ;
Stewart, Andrew K. ;
Winchester, David P. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. ;
Bentrem, David J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 207 (04) :510-519
[10]   Effect of hospital type and volume on lymph node evaluation for gastric and pancreatic cancer [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Talamonti, Mark S. ;
Wayne, Jeffrey D. ;
Tomlinson, James S. ;
Stewart, Andrew K. ;
Winchester, David P. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. ;
Bentrem, David J. .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2008, 143 (07) :671-678