US environmental load displacement: examining consumption, regulations and the role of NAFTA

被引:27
作者
Cole, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Dept Econ, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
US environmental load displacement; Mexico; NAFTA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.016
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In light of concerns that structural changes to US production may not be accompanied by similar changes to US consumption, this paper provides a detailed examination of US environmental load displacement over the period 1974-2001. The forces that drive Such displacement are also examined, with particular attention paid to the scale and composition of US consumption, the share of imports in consumption, the role of environmental regulations and the potential impact of NAFTA. It is found that the USA as a whole has experienced environmental load displacement over the period under consideration, with the extent of this displacement seeming to increase over the last decade. It would appear to be the increasing scale of US trade that is increasing environmental load displacement. Indeed, the composition of US imports and exports have become significantly cleaner over the period considered. However, although imports from Mexico have grown more rapidly than exports to Mexico, no evidence is found to suggest that NAFTA is increasing displacement to Mexico. With regard to US domestic consumption patterns, although they have become cleaner, a greater share than ever is now met via imports. Sectoral pollution abatement costs are found to be a determinant of this increasing share of imports in domestic consumption. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 450
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, MEXICO US FREE TRADE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, NAFTA ENV 7 YEARS LA
[3]  
Antweiler W., 1996, ECONOMIE SYSTEMS RES, V8, P361, DOI [DOI 10.1080/09535319600000027, https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319600000027]
[4]  
Cole M.A., 1997, Environment and Development Economics, V2, P401, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1355770X97000211
[5]   Determining the trade-environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations [J].
Cole, MA ;
Elliott, RJR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 46 (03) :363-383
[6]   Air pollution and 'dirty' industries:: How and why does the composition of manufacturing output change with economic development? [J].
Cole, MA .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2000, 17 (01) :109-123
[7]   Is environmental policy a secondary trade barrier? An empirical analysis [J].
Ederington, J ;
Minier, J .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2003, 36 (01) :137-154
[8]   The Kuznets curve for the environment and economic growth: Examining the evidence [J].
Ekins, P .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1997, 29 (05) :805-830
[9]   ECONOMIC-GROWTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT [J].
GROSSMAN, GM ;
KRUEGER, AB .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (02) :353-377
[10]   Reexamining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve [J].
Harbaugh, WT ;
Levinson, A ;
Wilson, DM .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2002, 84 (03) :541-551