nitrate;
water table;
controlled drainage;
subirrigation;
tile drainage;
water quality;
sandy loam;
Ontario;
D O I:
10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00172-4
中图分类号:
S [农业科学];
学科分类号:
09 ;
摘要:
Controlled drainage and subirrigation (CDS) are a recommended agricultural practice to improve agricultural water quality and crop productivity. An on-farm study was conducted to evaluate the influence of CDS on nitrate leaching and corn (Zea mays L.) yield in a sandy loam soil in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. A farm was divided into two 1.9 ha plots and planted with corn. One of the plots had a free tile drainage (FD) system, and the other plot was installed with a CDS system. Drainage water volumes and water quality were monitored from I May 1996 until 31 April 1997. The cumulative drainage water volume from the CDS treatment was 8% greater than the FD treatment over this period. The flow weighted mean nitrate concentration of the drainage water was reduced by 41% from 19.2 mg N1(-1) for FD treatment to 11.3 mg N1(-1) for the CDS treatment. Hence, the net effect of slightly increased drainage volumes and dramatically lower nitrate concentrations with the CDS treatment resulted in a cumulative nitrate loss of 36.8 kg N ha(-1) compared to 57.9 kg N ha(-1) for the FD treatment. The CDS treatment reduced total nitrate loss by 36% compared to the FD treatment. The soil moisture content (top 120 cm) in the CDS treatment was 21% greater than the FD treatment and the FD treatment had a water table depth that was 49 cm deeper (59%) than the CDS treatment. Therefore, it was not surprising that corn from the CDS treatment had 50% greater transpiration rates (47.4 mg m(-2) s(-1)) than the FD treatment (31.7 mg m(-2) s(-1)). Similarly, the stomatal conductance was 12% greater with the CDS treatment (0.73 cm s(-1)) when compared to the FD treatment (0.65 cm s(-1)). The average corn yields were 11.0 Mg ha(-1) from the CDS treatment and 6.7 Mg ha(-1) from the FD treatment which was a 64% yield increase. The CDS treatment also had higher (11%) water use efficiency than the FD treatment. Thus, the crops utilized N and water more efficiently in the CDS treatment which resulted in increased productivity and improved water quality. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.