Neighborhood Verification: A Strategy for Rewarding Close Forecasts

被引:141
作者
Ebert, Elizabeth E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Bur Meteorol, Ctr Australian Weather & Climate Res, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
关键词
PRECIPITATION FORECASTS; RESOLUTION; METHODOLOGY; VALIDATION; SYSTEMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1175/2009WAF2222251.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
High-resolution forecasts may be quite useful even when they do not match the observations exactly. Neighborhood verification is a strategy for evaluating the "closeness" of the forecast to the observations within space-time neighborhoods rather than at the grid scale. Various properties of the forecast within a neighborhood can be assessed for similarity to the observations, including the mean value, fractional coverage, occurrence of a forecast event sufficiently near an observed event, and so on. By varying the sizes of the neighborhoods, it is possible to determine the scales for which the forecast has sufficient skill for a particular application. Several neighborhood verification methods have been proposed in the literature in the last decade. This paper examines four such methods in detail for idealized and real high-resolution precipitation forecasts, highlighting what can be learned from each of the methods. When applied to idealized and real precipitation forecasts from the Spatial Verification Methods Intercomparison Project, all four methods showed improved forecast performance for neighborhood sizes larger than grid scale, with the optimal scale for each method varying as a function of rainfall intensity.
引用
收藏
页码:1498 / 1510
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Application of Spatial Verification Methods to Idealized and NWP-Gridded Precipitation Forecasts [J].
Ahijevych, David ;
Gilleland, Eric ;
Brown, Barbara G. ;
Ebert, Elizabeth E. .
WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2009, 24 (06) :1485-1497
[2]  
AMENT F, 2008, 30 EUR WEATH GROUP L
[3]   Verification of intense precipitation forecasts from single models and ensemble prediction systems [J].
Atger, F .
NONLINEAR PROCESSES IN GEOPHYSICS, 2001, 8 (06) :401-417
[4]   Sensitivity of several performance measures to displacement error, bias, and event frequency [J].
Baldwin, Michael E. ;
Kain, John S. .
WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2006, 21 (04) :636-648
[5]   False alarms and close calls: A conceptual model of warning accuracy [J].
Barnes, Lindsey R. ;
Gruntfest, Eve C. ;
Hayden, Mary H. ;
Schultz, David M. ;
Benight, Charles .
WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2007, 22 (05) :1140-1147
[6]  
Brooks HE, 1998, 19TH CONFERENCE ON SEVERE LOCAL STORMS, P552
[7]   Forecast verification: current status and future directions [J].
Casati, B. ;
Wilson, L. J. ;
Stephenson, D. B. ;
Nurmi, P. ;
Ghelli, A. ;
Pocernich, M. ;
Damrath, U. ;
Ebert, E. E. ;
Brown, B. G. ;
Mason, S. .
METEOROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2008, 15 (01) :3-18
[8]  
Damrath U., 2004, INT VER METH WORKSH
[9]  
DAVIS C, 2009, WEA FORECASTING, V24, P152
[10]   Object-based verification of precipitation forecasts. Part I: Methodology and application to mesoscale rain areas [J].
Davis, Christopher ;
Brown, Barbara ;
Bullock, Randy .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2006, 134 (07) :1772-1784