Evolution of proneural atonal expression during distinct regulatory phases in the developing Drosophila eye

被引:139
作者
Baker, NE
Yu, S
Han, D
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0960-9822(02)70715-X
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Receptors of the Notch family affect the determination of many cell types. In the Drosophila eye, Notch antagonises the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) protein atonal, which is required for R8 photoreceptor determination. Similar antagonism between Notch and proneural bHLH proteins regulates most neural cell determination, however, it is uncertain whether the mechanisms are similar in all cases. Here, we have analyzed the sensitivity of atonal expression to Notch signalling using a temperature-sensitive Notch allele, by the expression of activated Notch or of the ligand Serrate, and by monitoring expression of the atonal-dependent gene scabrous and of the Notch-dependent Enhancer of split genes. Results: The atonal expression pattern evolves from general 'prepattern' expression, through transient 'intermediate groups' to R8 precursor-specific expression. Successive phases of atonal expression differ in sensitivity to Notch. Prepattern expression of atonal is not inhibited. Inhibition begins at the intermediate group stage, corresponding to the period when atonal gene function is required for its own expression. At the transition to R8 cell-specific expression, Notch is activated in all intermediate group cells except the R8 cell precursor. R8 cells remain sensitive to inhibition in columns 0 and 1, but become less sensitive thereafter; non-R8 cells do not require Notch activity to keep atonal expression inactive. Thus, Notch signaling is coupled to atonal repression for only part of the atonal expression pattern. Accordingly, the Enhancer-of-split m delta protein is expressed reciprocally to atonal at the intermediate group and early R8 stages, but is expressed in other patterns before and after. Conclusions: In eye development, inhibition by Notch activity is restricted to specific phases of proneural gene expression, beginning when prepattern decays and is replaced by autoregulation. We suggest that Notch signalling inhibits atonal autoregulation, but not expression by other mechanisms, and that a transition from prepattern to autoregulation is necessary for patterning neural cell determination. Distinct neural tissues might differ in their proneural prepatterns, but use Notch in a similar mechanism. (C) Current Biology Ltd ISSN 0960-9822
引用
收藏
页码:1290 / 1301
页数:12
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   NOTCH SIGNALING [J].
ARTAVANISTSAKONAS, S ;
MATSUNO, K ;
FORTINI, ME .
SCIENCE, 1995, 268 (5208) :225-232
[2]   SUPPRESSOR OF HAIRLESS DIRECTLY ACTIVATES TRANSCRIPTION OF ENHANCER OF SPLIT COMPLEX GENES IN RESPONSE TO NOTCH RECEPTOR ACTIVITY [J].
BAILEY, AM ;
POSAKONY, JW .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 1995, 9 (21) :2609-2622
[3]   DROSOPHILA EYE DEVELOPMENT - NOTCH AND DELTA AMPLIFY A NEUROGENIC PATTERN CONFERRED ON THE MORPHOGENETIC FURROW BY SCABROUS [J].
BAKER, NE ;
ZITRON, AE .
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT, 1995, 49 (03) :173-189
[4]   ELLIPSE MUTATIONS IN THE DROSOPHILA HOMOLOG OF THE EGF RECEPTOR AFFECT PATTERN-FORMATION, CELL-DIVISION, AND CELL-DEATH IN EYE IMAGINAL DISKS [J].
BAKER, NE ;
RUBIN, GM .
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1992, 150 (02) :381-396
[5]   A LATE ROLE FOR A SUBSET OF NEUROGENIC GENES TO LIMIT SENSORY PRECURSOR RECRUITMENTS IN DROSOPHILA EMBRYOS [J].
BODMER, R ;
JAN, LY ;
JAN, YN .
ROUXS ARCHIVES OF DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1993, 202 (06) :371-381
[6]  
BRAND AH, 1993, DEVELOPMENT, V118, P401
[7]   HAIRY AND EMC NEGATIVELY REGULATE MORPHOGENETIC FURROW PROGRESSION IN THE DROSOPHILA EYE [J].
BROWN, NL ;
SATTLER, CA ;
PADDOCK, SW ;
CARROLL, SB .
CELL, 1995, 80 (06) :879-887
[8]   NOTCH IS REQUIRED FOR SUCCESSIVE CELL DECISIONS IN THE DEVELOPING DROSOPHILA RETINA [J].
CAGAN, RL ;
READY, DF .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 1989, 3 (08) :1099-1112
[9]   PRIMARY NEUROGENESIS IN XENOPUS EMBRYOS REGULATED BY A HOMOLOG OF THE DROSOPHILA NEUROGENIC GENE-DELTA [J].
CHITNIS, A ;
HENRIQUE, D ;
LEWIS, J ;
ISHHOROWICZ, D ;
KINTNER, C .
NATURE, 1995, 375 (6534) :761-766
[10]  
DAWSON SR, 1995, MOL CELL BIOL, V15, P6923