Questionnaires to assess urinary and anal incontinence: Review and recommendations

被引:91
作者
Avery, K. N. L.
Bosch, J. L. H. R.
Gotoh, M.
Naughton, M.
Jackson, S.
Radley, S. C.
Valiquette, L.
Batista, J.
Donovan, J. L.
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Social Med, Bristol BS8 2PR, Avon, England
[2] John Radcliffe Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[3] Royal Hallamshire Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Sheffield S10 2JF, S Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[6] Wake Forest Univ, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
[7] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Div Urol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[8] Ctr Med Teknon, Urodynam Unit, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
bladder; urinary incontinence; fecal incontinence; outcome assessment (health care); questionnaires;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.075
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We reviewed and provide recommendations about the most scientifically robust and appropriate questionnaires for evaluating symptoms and the quality of life impact of urinary and/or anal incontinence, and vaginal and pelvic floor problems. We also investigated the use of these questionnaires in randomized, controlled trials of treatment strategies. Materials and Methods: The Symptom and Quality of Life Committee of the International Consultation on Incontinence performed a systematic review of questionnaires related to urinary and anal incontinence, and vaginal and pelvic floor problems, searching MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library (R) and other electronic databases between 2001 and 2004. Results: A total of 23 robust and relevant questionnaires could be recommended in clinical practice and research. The development of questionnaires to assess anal incontinence, and pelvic floor and vaginal problems has been limited with some promising measures but with none achieving the highest level of rigor. From 2001 to 2004 there were 150 published randomized trials of treatments for incontinence. Increasingly trials of incontinence are using recommended measures (38% of those for urinary incontinence and 22% of those for anal incontinence used the highest quality questionnaires in 2001 to 2004) but. none of vaginal and pelvic floor problems used recommended questionnaires. Conclusions: With increasing acknowledgment of the value of patient based assessment much attention has been given to the development. of questionnaires to assess symptoms and quality of life. Sufficient measures are now available for urinary incontinence, and researchers and clinicians are encouraged to use the 18 achieving the highest level of rigor and their validated translations. In contrast, the development of questionnaires for anal incontinence and pelvic/vaginal problems is in its infancy and further study in this area is needed. Randomized trials of treatments for incontinence should use only questionnaires achieving the highest level of scientific rigor.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 49
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
AARONSON NK, 1989, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V10, pS195
[2]   European psychometric validation of the CONTILIFE®:: A Quality of Life questionnaire for urinary incontinence [J].
Amarenco, G ;
Arnould, B ;
Carita, P ;
Haab, F ;
Labat, JJ ;
Richard, F .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 43 (04) :391-404
[3]   ICIQ: A brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence [J].
Avery, K ;
Donovan, J ;
Peters, TJ ;
Shaw, C ;
Gotoh, M ;
Abrams, P .
NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2004, 23 (04) :322-330
[4]   Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders [J].
Barber, MD ;
Kuchibhatla, MN ;
Pieper, CF ;
Bump, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (06) :1388-1395
[5]   A scored form of the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire: Data from a randomized controlled trial of surgery for women with stress incontinence [J].
Brookes, ST ;
Donovan, JL ;
Wright, M ;
Jackson, S ;
Abrams, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (01) :73-82
[6]   A new condition-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for the assessment of women with anal incontinence [J].
Bugg, GJ ;
Kiff, ES ;
Hosker, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 108 (10) :1057-1067
[7]   Postpartum flatal and fecal incontinence quality-of-life scale: A disease- and population-specific measure [J].
Cockell, SJ ;
Oates-Johnson, T ;
Gilmour, DT ;
Vallis, TM ;
Turnbull, GK .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2003, 13 (08) :1132-1144
[8]   Quality of life assessment in men and women with urinary incontinence [J].
Corcos, J ;
Beaulieu, S ;
Donovan, J ;
Naughton, M ;
Gotoh, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (03) :896-905
[9]   Psychometric validation of an overactive bladder symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire: The OAB-q [J].
Coyne, K ;
Revicki, D ;
Hunt, T ;
Corey, R ;
Stewart, W ;
Bentkover, J ;
Kurth, H ;
Abrams, P .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2002, 11 (06) :563-574
[10]   Validation of an Italian version of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire [J].
Digesu, GA ;
Santamato, S ;
Khullar, V ;
Santillo, V ;
Digesu, A ;
Cormio, G ;
Loverro, G ;
Selvaggi, L .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2003, 106 (02) :184-192