Collaborative environmental institutions: All talk and no action?

被引:127
作者
Lubell, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/pam.20026
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Many analysts view collaborative institutions that attempt to forge consensus and build cooperation among conflicting stakeholders as a potential remedy to the pathologies of conventional environmental policy. However, few analyses have demonstrated that collaborative institutions actually increase levels of cooperation, and critics accuse collaborative institutions of all talk and no action. This paper reports the use a quasi-experimental design to compare the levels of consensus and cooperation in coastal watersheds with and without U.S. EPA National Estuary Programs, one of the most prominent national examples of collaborative institutions in the environmental policy domain. Panel survey data from more than 800 respondents shows that while the level of consensus is higher in NEP estuaries, there is no difference between NEP and non-NEP estuaries in the level of cooperation. (C) 2004 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 573
页数:25
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Achen ChristopherH., 1986, STAT ANAL QUASIEXPER
[2]  
[Anonymous], ASSESSING EFFECTIVEN
[3]   THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION [J].
AXELROD, R ;
HAMILTON, WD .
SCIENCE, 1981, 211 (4489) :1390-1396
[4]  
BARACH E, 1998, GETTING AGENCIES WOR
[5]   Assessing consensus: The promise and performance of negotiated rulemaking [J].
Coglianese, C .
DUKE LAW JOURNAL, 1997, 46 (06) :1255-1349
[6]  
Coleman J. S., 1990, Foundations of Social Theory
[7]  
DOWNS A, 1972, PUBLIC INTEREST, P38
[8]  
DUNLAP RE, 1990, AM ENV US ENV MENTAL
[9]   SYMBOLS AND POLITICAL QUIESCENCE [J].
EDELMAN, M .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1960, 54 (03) :695-704
[10]  
Edelman Murray., 1964, SYMBOLIC USES POLITI