Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm

被引:300
作者
Raghavan, ML
Vorp, DA
Federle, MP
Makaroun, MS
Webster, MW
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Presbyterian Univ Hosp 1011, Dept Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Bioengn, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mva.2000.103971
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture is believed to occur when the mechanical stress acting on the wall exceeds the strength of the wall tissue. Therefore, knowledge of the stress distribution in an intact AAA wall could be useful in assessing its risk of rupture. We developed a methodology to noninvasively estimate the in vivo wall stress distribution for actual AAAs on a patient-to-patient basis. Methods: Six patients with AAAs and one control patient with a nonaneurysmal aorta were the study subjects. Data from spiral computed tomography scans were used as a means of three-dimensionally reconstructing the in situ geometry of the intact AAAs and the control aorta. We used a nonlinear biomechanical model developed specifically for AAA wall tissue. By means of the finite element method, the stress distribution on the aortic wall of all subjects under systolic blood pressure was determined and studied. Results: In all the AAA cases, the wall stress was complexly distributed, with distinct regions of high and low stress. Peak wall stress among AAA. patients varied from 29 N/cm(2) to 45 N/cm(2) and was found on the posterior surface in all cases studied. The wall stress on the nonaneurysmal aorta in the control subject was relatively low and uniformly distributed, with a peak wall stress of 12 N/cm(2). AAA volume, rather than AAA diameter, was shown by means of statistical analysis to be a better indicator of high wall stresses and possibly rupture. Conclusion: The approach taken to estimate AAA wall stress distribution is completely noninvasive and does not require any additional involvement or expense by the AAA patient. We believe that this methodology may allow for the evaluation of an individual AAA's rupture risk on a more biophysically sound basis than the widely used 5-cm AAA diameter criterion.
引用
收藏
页码:760 / 769
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1967, THIN ELASTIC SHELLS
[2]  
*ANSYS, 1996, ANSYS US MAN, P630
[3]   Risk factors associated with rapid growth of small abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Chang, JB ;
Stein, TA ;
Liu, JP ;
Dunn, ME .
SURGERY, 1997, 121 (02) :117-122
[4]  
COLE CW, 1989, CAN MED ASSOC J, V141, P393
[5]   VARIABLES THAT AFFECT THE EXPANSION RATE AND OUTCOME OF SMALL ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSMS [J].
CRONENWETT, JL ;
SARGENT, SK ;
WALL, MH ;
HAWKES, ML ;
FREEMAN, DH ;
DAIN, BJ ;
CURE, JK ;
WALSH, DB ;
ZWOLAK, RM ;
MCDANIEL, MD ;
SCHNEIDER, JR .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1990, 11 (02) :260-269
[6]  
DARLING RC, 1977, CIRCULATION, V56, P161
[7]   Residual strain effects on the stress field in a thick wall finite element model of the human carotid bifurcation [J].
Delfino, A ;
Stergiopulos, N ;
Moore, JE ;
Meister, JJ .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1997, 30 (08) :777-786
[8]   Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the presence of endoluminal thrombus: Experimental characterisation and structural static computational analysis [J].
Di Martino, E ;
Mantero, S ;
Inzoli, F ;
Melissano, G ;
Astore, D ;
Chiesa, R ;
Fumero, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 15 (04) :290-299
[9]   The influence of shape on the stresses in model abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Elger, DF ;
Blackketter, DM ;
Budwig, RS ;
Johansen, KH .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1996, 118 (03) :326-332
[10]  
Fung YC., 1993, BIOMECHANICS, V2nd, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4757-2257-4_8, DOI 10.1038/NCOMMS7205]