Mirror neurons: From origin to function

被引:337
作者
Cook, Richard [1 ]
Bird, Geoffrey [2 ]
Catmur, Caroline [3 ]
Press, Clare [4 ]
Heyes, Cecilia [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] City Univ London, Dept Psychol, London EC1R 0JD, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, MRC, Social Genet & Dev Psychiat Ctr, London SE5 8AF, England
[3] Univ Surrey, Dept Psychol, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
[4] Univ London Birkbeck Coll, Dept Psychol Sci, London WC1E 7HX, England
[5] Univ Oxford All Souls Coll, Oxford OX1 4AL, England
[6] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Oxford OX1 3UD, England
关键词
action understanding; associative learning; contextual modulation; contingency; genetic adaptation; imitation; mirror neuron; poverty of the stimulus; sensorimotor experience;
D O I
10.1017/S0140525X13000903
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article argues that mirror neurons originate in sensorimotor associative learning and therefore a new approach is needed to investigate their functions. Mirror neurons were discovered about 20 years ago in the monkey brain, and there is now evidence that they are also present in the human brain. The intriguing feature of many mirror neurons is that they fire not only when the animal is performing an action, such as grasping an object using a power grip, but also when the animal passively observes a similar action performed by another agent. It is widely believed that mirror neurons are a genetic adaptation for action understanding; that they were designed by evolution to fulfill a specific socio-cognitive function. In contrast, we argue that mirror neurons are forged by domain-general processes of associative learning in the course of individual development, and, although they may have psychological functions, they do not necessarily have a specific evolutionary purpose or adaptive function. The evidence supporting this view shows that (1) mirror neurons do not consistently encode action "goals"; (2) the contingency-and context-sensitive nature of associative learning explains the full range of mirror neuron properties; (3) human infants receive enough sensorimotor experience to support associative learning of mirror neurons ("wealth of the stimulus"); and (4) mirror neurons can be changed in radical ways by sensorimotor training. The associative account implies that reliable information about the function of mirror neurons can be obtained only by research based on developmental history, system-level theory, and careful experimentation.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 192
页数:16
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
The present article concerns what might be described as "motor" MNs-that is, MNs that are responsive during the observation and performance of actions
[2]  
There may be neurons with analogous properties involved in empathetic emotional and somatosensory responses
[3]  
This interesting possibility is beyond the scope of the present article
[4]  
But for discussion of how an associative framework may be applied to the origins of empathic mirroring, see Heyes and Bird
[5]  
Infant research suggesting that tongue-protrusion "imitation" improves over trials, in the absence of visual feedback, has been taken as evidence against the view that this "imitation" effect is really a nonspecific exploratory response (Soussignan et al 2011
[6]  
However, a recent experiment showing that even adults cannot improve their imitative performance in the absence of visual feedback suggests that the trends observed in the infant data may not have been signs of improvement
[7]  
Central alpha suppression is often seen alongside attenuation of beta band (∼15-30 Hz) oscillations, and beta effects are thought to reflect motor processing
[8]  
The sum of the two effects is defined as "mu suppression" (Hari & Salmelin 1997
[9]  
but this term is often used more liberally in the MN literature, to refer to effects observed solely in the alpha band
[10]  
Monkey studies reporting this information suggest that MN responses start around 250 msec after observed movement onset (di Pellegrino et al. 1992