Sorting second-grade students: Differentiating those retained from those promoted

被引:26
作者
Beebe-Frankenberger, M [1 ]
Bocian, KM
MacMillan, DL
Gresham, FM
机构
[1] Univ Montana, Dept Psychol, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[2] Univ Calif Riverside, Grad Sch Educ, Riverside, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.204
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
A cohort of 2nd-grade students provided comparisons of academic and social competence based on school retention/promotion decisions. Sample groups were (a) retained, (b) at risk for retention, (c) special education, and (d) promoted. Findings suggested most children with academic deficiencies are identified by schools early and are sorted into educational treatments differing in intensity that represent a continuum of competence. The authors provide empirical evidence counter to the assumptions that retained students have the requisite ability to catch up and have more problem behaviors than other low-achieving students. The relevance of high-stakes test scores for promotion/retention decisions and the parallels between schools' implementation of retention policy and implementation of regulations for identifying children with disabilities are included in the discussion.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 215
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
ALEXANDER K, 1994, SUCCESS FAILURE MEAS
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association (APA), 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, P5
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, STATE UNION ADDRESS
[4]  
[Anonymous], INQUIRIES LIT THEORY
[5]  
Balow I. H., 1990, RETENTION GRADE FAIL
[6]  
BLOOM BS, 1984, EDUC LEADERSHIP, V41, P4
[7]  
Bocian K. M., 1999, LEARNING DISABILITIE, V14, P1
[8]  
BYRNES DA, 1985, EDUCATION, V106, P208
[9]  
Cairns R. B., 1994, LIFELINES RISKS PATH
[10]  
Catterall JS., 1987, HIGH SCH J, V71, P19