Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms

被引:603
作者
Albrizio, Silvia [1 ]
Kozluk, Tomasz [2 ]
Zipperer, Vera [3 ]
机构
[1] Org Econ Cooperat & Dev, Dept Econ, Paris, France
[2] Org Econ Cooperat & Dev, Dept Econ, Environm Directorate, Paris, France
[3] DIW Berlin, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Environmental policy stringency; Environmental regulation; Porter Hypothesis; Multifactor productivity; PANEL-DATA EVIDENCE; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; MANUFACTURING-INDUSTRIES; OECD COUNTRIES; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; REGULATIONS; INNOVATION; IMPACT; COMPETITIVENESS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeem.2016.06.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the impact of changes in environmental policy stringency on industry- and firm-level productivity growth in a panel of OECD countries. To test the strong version of the Porter Hypothesis (PH), we extend a neo-Schumpeterian productivity model to allow for effects of environmental policies. We use a new environmental policy stringency (EPS) index and let the effect of countries' environmental policies vary with the pollution intensity of the industry and with the countries' and firms' technological advancement. A tightening of environmental policy is associated with a short-term increase in industry-level productivity growth in the most technologically advanced countries. This effect diminishes with the distance to the global productivity frontier, eventually becoming insignificant. For the average firm, no evidence of PH is found. However, the most productive firms see a temporary boost in productivity growth, while the less productive ones experience a productivity slowdown. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 226
页数:18
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Aghion, P ;
Zilibotti, F .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2006, 4 (01) :37-74
[2]  
Ackerberg D., 2006, Munich Personal Repec Archive
[3]   Joseph Schumpeter Lecture - Appropriate growth policy: A unifying framework [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Howitt, Peter .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2006, 4 (2-3) :269-314
[4]  
Albrizio S., 2014, OECD EC DEP WORKING, V1179
[5]  
Albrizio S., 2016, DOES INT PA IN PRESS
[6]   Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and US food manufacturing [J].
Alpay, E ;
Buccola, S ;
Kerkvliet, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 84 (04) :887-901
[7]   The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Cohen, Mark A. ;
Elgie, Stewart ;
Lanoie, Paul .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) :2-22
[8]  
Andrews D., 2014, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, V1127
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2015, OECD J EC STUD, DOI [10.1787/19952856, DOI 10.1787/ECO_STUDIES-2014-5JZ2DRQML75J]
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2011, OECD ENV WORKING PAP