A prospective and randomized study, "SVEA," comparing effects of three methods for delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result

被引:126
作者
Brandberg, Y
Malm, M
Blomqvist, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Hosp, Dept Reconstruct Plast Surg, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Hosp, Dept Oncol, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00006534-200001000-00011
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
During the last 30 years, many methods for delayed breast reconstruction have been described. There is a lack of prospective randomized trials comparing reconstruction methods. The present study (SVEA), conducted 1995 to 1996, describes the impacts of three methods: the lateral thoracodorsal flap, the latissimus dorsi flap. and the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap (TRAM), on important areas of life, patients' perception of cosmetic result, and quality of life. Questionnaires were completed before randomization and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The preoperative questionnaire concerned the impact of breast loss and expectations on reconstruction. Follow-up questionnaires dealt with satisfaction with cosmetic result and impact on important areas of life. A health-related quality of life questionnaire (SF-36) was completed at all points of assessment. A total of 75 of 87 randomized patients underwent breast reconstruction: 16 patients with the lateral thoracodorsal flap, 30 with the latissimus dorsi flap, and 29 with the TRAM flap. The majority were very satisfied with the cosmetic result. Most women reported improvements in important areas of life, and quality of life in terms of "social functioning" and "mental health" increased significantly after the reconstruction. The latissimus dorsi flap and TRAM flap scored significantly higher as compared with the lateral thoracodorsal flap for similarity with the contralateral breast and reduced problems in social situations. No differences between irradiated and nonirradiated patients were found. All methods were considered to product good cosmetic results and improvements in patient-defined problem areas of life and quality of life. No negative effects were recorded. Thus, irrespective of method, breast reconstruction is a valuable tool for the mastectomized woman to cope with problems in everyday life.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 74
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   DEEP INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC PERFORATOR FLAP FOR BREAST RECONSTRUCTION [J].
ALLEN, RJ ;
TREECE, P .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1994, 32 (01) :32-38
[2]   SUPERIOR GLUTEAL ARTERY PERFORATOR FREE-FLAP FOR BREAST RECONSTRUCTION [J].
ALLEN, RJ ;
TUCKER, C .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1995, 95 (07) :1207-1212
[3]  
BOHMERT H, 1980, ACTA CHIR BELG, V79, P105
[4]   BREAST RECONSTRUCTION AFTER A RADICAL MASTECTOMY [J].
BOSTWICK, J ;
VASCONEZ, LO ;
JURKIEWICZ, MJ .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1978, 61 (05) :682-693
[5]  
Brandberg Y, 1999, SCAND J PLAST RECONS, V33, P209
[6]   POSTMASTECTOMY RECONSTRUCTION - COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF THE PSYCHOSOCIAL, FUNCTIONAL, AND COSMETIC EFFECTS OF TRANSVERSE RECTUS-ABDOMINIS MUSCULOCUTANEOUS FLAP VERSUS BREAST IMPLANT RECONSTRUCTION [J].
CEDERNA, PS ;
YATES, WR ;
CHANG, P ;
CRAM, AE ;
RICCIARDELLI, EJ .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1995, 35 (05) :458-468
[7]  
Corsten L A, 1992, Wis Med J, V91, P125
[8]   THE LATERAL TRANSVERSE THIGH FREE FLAP - AN ALTERNATIVE FOR AUTOGENOUS-TISSUE BREAST RECONSTRUCTION [J].
ELLIOTT, LF ;
BEEGLE, PH ;
HARTRAMPF, CR .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1990, 85 (02) :169-178
[9]  
EVANS AA, 1993, J ROY SOC MED, V86, P630
[10]   Factors contributing to patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction using silicone gel implants [J].
FeeFulkerson, K ;
Conaway, MR ;
Winer, EP ;
Fulkerson, CC ;
Rimer, BK ;
Georgiade, G .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1996, 97 (07) :1420-1426