Utility of rodent models for evaluating protein allergenicity

被引:14
作者
Bowman, Christal C. [1 ]
Selgrade, MaryJane K. [1 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Immunotoxicol Branch, Expt Toxicol Div, Natl Hlth & Environm Effects Res Lab, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
关键词
Allergenicity; Biotechnology; Food allergy; Oral tolerance; Digestibility; Genetically modified food; Animal model; ORAL SENSITIZATION MODEL; BROWN-NORWAY RATS; CHOLERA-TOXIN; MURINE MODEL; BRAZIL NUT; ACTIVATION PATTERNS; ANTIBODY-RESPONSES; IMMUNE-RESPONSES; PEANUT ALLERGENS; SOLUBLE-ANTIGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.10.002
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
030101 [法学理论]; 030111 [法律史学]; 100218 [急诊医学];
摘要
Animal models are needed to assess novel proteins produced through biotechnology for potential dietary allergenicity. The exact characteristics that give certain foods allergenic potential are unclear, but must include both the potential to sensitize (induce IgE) as well as the capacity to avoid induction of oral tolerance (specific inhibition of IgE production). EPA has developed two complementary mouse models; one which distinguishes allergenic from non-allergenic food extracts using oral sensitization with adjuvant (cholera toxin) and another which further distinguishes highly potent allergens following oral administration without adjuvant based on the development (or not) of tolerance. For the foods tested thus far (roasted or raw peanut, Brazil nut, egg white, turkey, and spinach), the ability to sensitize and/or tolerize in these models are consistent with observed allergenicity as well as persistence and severity among allergens. Additionally, in vitro pepsin-resistance analysis of these food extracts suggests an association between sensitization capacity and proteins which are stable to gastric digestion. A subcutaneous exposure model did not distinguish allergenic from non-allergenic foods and does not appear useful for assessing potential allergenicity. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:S58 / S61
页数:4
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]
Peanut- and cow's milk-specific IgE, Th2 cells and local anaphylactic reaction are induced in Balb/c mice orally sensitized with cholera toxin [J].
Adel-Patient, K ;
Bernard, H ;
Ah-Leung, S ;
Créminon, C ;
Wal, JM .
ALLERGY, 2005, 60 (05) :658-664
[2]
Examination of oral sensitization with ovalbumin in Brown Norway rats and three strains of mice [J].
Akiyama, H ;
Teshima, R ;
Sakushima, J ;
Okunuki, H ;
Goda, Y ;
Sawada, J ;
Toyoda, M .
IMMUNOLOGY LETTERS, 2001, 78 (01) :1-5
[3]
*AM AC ALL ASTHM I, 2005, ALL REP, V3
[4]
Stability of food allergens to digestion in vitro [J].
Astwood, JD ;
Leach, JN ;
Fuchs, RL .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1996, 14 (10) :1269-1273
[5]
Intradermal exposure of BALB/c strain mice to peanut protein elicits a type 2 cytokine response [J].
Betts, CJ ;
Flanagan, BF ;
Caddick, HT ;
Dearman, RJ ;
Kimber, I .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2004, 42 (10) :1589-1599
[6]
Anaphylaxis from Brazil nut [J].
Borja, JM ;
Bartolome, B ;
Gomez, E ;
Galindo, PA ;
Feo, F .
ALLERGY, 1999, 54 (09) :1007-1008
[7]
Differences in allergenic potential of food extracts following oral exposure in mice reflect differences in digestibility: Potential approaches to safety assessment [J].
Bowman, Christal C. ;
Selgrade, MaryJane K. .
TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 102 (01) :100-109
[8]
Starlink corn: A risk analysis [J].
Bucchini, L ;
Goldman, LR .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2002, 110 (01) :5-13
[9]
*CAC, 2003, COD AL GUID COND FOO, P47
[10]
*CAC, 2003, 4 SESS COD AD HOC IN