Autograft reconstructions for bone defects in primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees

被引:27
作者
Kharbanda, Yatinder [1 ]
Sharma, Mrinal [1 ]
机构
[1] Indraprastha Apollo Hosp, Dept Orthoped, New Delhi, India
关键词
Osteoarthritis knee; autografting; bone defects; primary total knee replacement; severe varus deformity;
D O I
10.4103/0019-5413.132525
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Background: Large posteromedial defects encountered in severe varus knees during primary total knee arthroplasty can be treated by cementoplasty, structural bone grafts or metallic wedges. The option is selected depending upon the size of the defect. We studied the outcome of autograft (structural and impaction bone grafting) reconstruction of medial tibial bone defects encountered during primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees. Materials and Methods: Out of 675 primary varus knees operated, bone defects in proximal tibia were encountered in 54 knees. Posteromedial defects involving 25-40% of the tibial condyle cut surface and measuring more than 5 mm in depth were grafted using a structural graft obtained from cut distal femur or proximal tibia in 48 knees. For larger, peripheral uncontained vertical defects in six cases, measuring >25 mm in depth and involving >40% cut surface of proximal tibial condyle, impaction bone grafting with a mesh support was used. Results: Bone grafts incorporated in 54 knees in 6 months. There was no graft collapse or stress fractures, loosening or nonunion. The average followup period was 7.8 years (range 5-10 years). We observed an average postoperative increase in the Knee Society Score from 40 to 90 points. There was improvement in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores in terms of pain, stiffness and physical function during activities of daily living. Conclusion: Bone grafting for defects in primary total knee is justified as it is biological, available then and is cost effective besides preserving bone stock for future revisions. Structural grafts should be used in defects > 5 mm deep and involving 25-40% of the cut proximal tibial condyle surface. For larger peripheral vertical defects, impaction bone grafting contained in a mesh should be done.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 318
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Aglietti P, 1991, J Arthroplasty, V6, P287, DOI 10.1016/S0883-5403(06)80178-6
[2]
Altchek D, 1989, J Arthroplasty, V4, P151, DOI 10.1016/S0883-5403(89)80068-3
[3]
Cai Xu, 2008, Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, V88, P2907
[4]
DORR LD, 1989, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V20, P179
[5]
DORR LD, 1986, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P5
[6]
Gaweda Krzysztof, 2006, Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol, V71, P423
[7]
INSALL JN, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P13
[8]
Keska Rafal, 2009, Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol, V74, P214
[9]
LASKIN RS, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P66
[10]
Liu Jun, 2011, Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, V91, P2046