Measurement of ambient aerosol composition during the PMTACS-NY 2001 using an aerosol mass spectrometer. Part I: Mass concentrations

被引:101
作者
Drewnick, F
Schwab, JJ
Jayne, JT
Canagaratna, M
Worsnop, DR
Demerjian, KL
机构
[1] SUNY Albany, Atmospher Sci Res Ctr, Albany, NY 12203 USA
[2] Aerodyne Res Inc, Ctr Aerosol & Cloud Chem, Billerica, MA 01821 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/02786820390229507
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Semicontinuous ambient aerosol composition measurements performed during the PMTACS-NY Summer 2001 field campaign in Queens/New York with an aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS, developed by Aerodyne Research Inc.) are described. The measurements include 10 min averages of the nonrefractory sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, chloride, and organic mass concentrations in the particle size range of 50 to approximately 1000 nm. Particle-bound water concentrations (i.e., aerosol liquid water content) were estimated from the mass spectral information and local meteorological data. Aggregate semicontinuous AMS mass measurements were compared with those from a TEOM mass monitor that was also deployed at the PMTACS-NY 2001 site. On average, the AMS observed 64% of the total particulate matter mass measured by the TEOM Monitor. Filter and additional semicontinuous particulate sulfate measurements performed simultaneously at the site suggest that the observed discrepancy in mass balance between the two instruments is attributable to a combination of large particles (greater than or equal to1 mum) lost in the AMS inlet system and the refractory aerosol components not measured by the AMS. Measured diurnal patterns of sulfate, nitrate, organics, and total nonrefractory mass concentrations indicate that elevated PM levels measured during this campaign were due to regional transport as well as local production of particulate matter.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 103
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Quantitative sampling using an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer - 1. Techniques of data interpretation and error analysis [J].
Allan, JD ;
Jimenez, JL ;
Williams, PI ;
Alfarra, MR ;
Bower, KN ;
Jayne, JT ;
Coe, H ;
Worsnop, DR .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D3)
[2]   MASS-SPECTROMETRIC ANALYZER FOR INDIVIDUAL AEROSOL-PARTICLES [J].
ALLEN, J ;
GOULD, RK .
REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1981, 52 (06) :804-809
[3]   Atmospheric aerosols: Biogeochemical sources and role in atmospheric chemistry [J].
Andreae, MO ;
Crutzen, PJ .
SCIENCE, 1997, 276 (5315) :1052-1058
[4]   An analysis of four models predicting the partitioning of semivolatile inorganic aerosol components [J].
Ansari, AS ;
Pandis, SN .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 31 (2-3) :129-153
[5]  
BOLTON D, 1980, MON WEATHER REV, V108, P1046, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108<1046:TCOEPT>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   Theoretical determination of absolute electron-impact ionization cross sections of molecules [J].
Deutsch, H ;
Becker, K ;
Matt, S ;
Märk, TD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2000, 197 :37-69
[8]   Measurement of ambient aerosol composition during the PMTACS-NY 2001 using an aerosol mass spectrometer. Part II: Chemically speciated mass distributions [J].
Drewnick, F ;
Jayne, JT ;
Canagaratna, M ;
Worsnop, DR ;
Demerjian, KL .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 38 :104-117
[9]   Intercomparison and evaluation of four semi-continuous PM2.5 sulfate instruments [J].
Drewnick, F ;
Schwab, JJ ;
Hogrefe, O ;
Peters, S ;
Husain, L ;
Diamond, D ;
Weber, R ;
Demerjian, KL .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (24) :3335-3350
[10]  
HINDS WC, 1999, AEROSOL TECHNOLGY