Multiple uses of visual motion. The case for stability in sensory cortex

The problem of 'readout' from sensory maps has received considerable attention recently. Specifically, many experiments in different systems have suggested that the routing of sensory signals from cortical maps can be impressively flexible. In this review, we discuss many of the experiments addressing readout of motion signals from the middle temporal area (also known as V5) in the macaque monkey. We focus on two different types of output: perceptual reports (categorical decisions, usually) and motion-guided eye movements. We specifically consider situations in which multiple-motion vectors present in the stimulus are combined, as well as those in which one or more of the vectors in the stimulus is selected for output. The results of these studies suggest that in some situations multiple motions are vector averaged, while in others multiple vectors can be maintained. Interestingly, in most of the experiments producing a single (often average) vector, the output is a movement. However, many perceptual experiments involve the simultaneous processing of multiple-stimulus motions. One prosaic explanation for this pattern of apparently discrepant results is that different downstream structures impose different rules, in parallel, on the output from sensory maps such as the one in the middle temporal area. We also specifically discuss the case of motion opponency, a specific readout rule that has been posited to explain perceptual phenomena such as the waterfall illusion (motion aftereffect). We present evidence from a recent experiment showing that an opponent step must occur downstream from the middle temporal area itself. This observation is consistent with our proposal that significant processing need occur downstream from sensory structures. If a single output is to be used for multiple purposes, often at once, this necessitates a degree of task invariance on the sensory information present even at a relatively high level of cortical processing. (C) 2002 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.