Principles for the selection of doses in chronic rodent bioassays

被引:23
作者
Foran, JA
Allaben, WT
Ashby, J
Bass, R
Wharf, C
Bucher, JR
Burnam, W
Bus, JS
Butterworth, BE
Carakostas, M
Emerson, J
Cardona, RA
Cohen, SM
DeGeorge, J
FennerCrisp, P
Gaylor, D
Gee, JF
Goodman, JI
Grant, DL
Hattan, DG
Hayashi, Y
Henderson, RF
Herrman, JL
Koeter, HBWM
LeBoeuf, RA
Lorentzen, RJ
McConnell, EE
Mitsumori, K
Olin, SS
Parker, JC
Renwick, A
Stevens, JT
Swenberg, JA
Taylor, AS
VanGemert, M
Vu, V
Walker, R
Watson, M
Yielding, KL
机构
[1] US FDA, NATL CTR TOXICOL RES, JEFFERSON, AR 72079 USA
[2] ZENECA LTD, ALDERLEY PARK, CHESHIRE, ENGLAND
[3] NIEHS, NATL TOXICOL PROGRAM, RES TRIANGLE PK, NC 27709 USA
[4] US EPA, OFF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS, WASHINGTON, DC 20460 USA
[5] DOW CHEM CO USA, MIDLAND, MI 48674 USA
[6] CHEM IND INST TOXICOL, RES TRIANGLE PK, NC 27709 USA
[7] COCA COLA CO, ATLANTA, GA USA
[8] UNIROYAL CHEM CO, BETHANY, CT USA
[9] UNIV NEBRASKA, MED CTR, OMAHA, NE USA
[10] US FDA, CTR DRUG EVALUAT & RES, ROCKVILLE, MD 20857 USA
[11] CALIF ENVIRONM PROTECT AGCY, DEPT PESTICIDE REGULAT, SACRAMENTO, CA USA
[12] MICHIGAN STATE UNIV, DEPT PHARMACOL & TOXICOL, E LANSING, MI 48824 USA
[13] HLTH CANADA, PEST MANAGEMENT REGULATORY AGCY, OTTAWA, ON K1A 0L2, CANADA
[14] US FDA, CTR FOOD SAFETY & APPL NUTR, WASHINGTON, DC 20204 USA
[15] NATL INST HLTH SCI, DIV RISK ASSESSMENT, TOKYO, JAPAN
[16] LOVELACE BIOMED & ENVIRONM RES INST, INHALAT TOXICOL RES INST, ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87185 USA
[17] WHO, INT PROGRAMME CHEM SAFETY, CH-1211 GENEVA, SWITZERLAND
[18] ORG ECON COOPERAT & DEV, ENVIRONM DIRECTORATE, PARIS, FRANCE
[19] PROCTER & GAMBLE CO, CINCINNATI, OH USA
[20] US FDA, OFF PLANNING & STRATEG INITIAT, WASHINGTON, DC 20204 USA
[21] NATL INST HLTH SCI, BIOL SAFETY RES CTR, TOKYO 158, JAPAN
[22] US EPA, OFF RES & DEV, WASHINGTON, DC 20460 USA
[23] UNIV SOUTHAMPTON, CLIN PHARMACOL GRP, SOUTHAMPTON, HANTS, ENGLAND
[24] CIBA GEIGY LTD, BASEL, SWITZERLAND
[25] UNIV N CAROLINA, CHAPEL HILL, NC USA
[26] BRI INT, SAN DIEGO, CA USA
[27] US EPA, OFF POLLUT PREVENT & TOX, WASHINGTON, DC 20460 USA
[28] UNIV SURREY, SCH BIOL SCI, GUILDFORD GU2 5XH, SURREY, ENGLAND
[29] UNIV TEXAS, MED BRANCH, GALVESTON, TX 77550 USA
[30] CHARLES CONN & VAN GEMERT, CHARLOTTE HALL, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3433048
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Dose selection in chronic rodent bioassays has been one of the most debated issues in risk assessment. The Committee on Risk Assessment Methods of the National Research Council attempted but failed, in 1993 to reach consensus on how to select doses for chronic rodent bioassays. However, a more recent effort conducted by the ILSI Risk Science Institute has resulted in a consensus set of principles for dose selection, including selection of the highest dose for chronic rodent bioassays. The principles encourage a move away from sole reliance on a maximum tolerated dose (MTD), as it has been traditionally defined (primarily by body weight and histopathology), and toward the use of sound scientific and toxicologic principles for the selection of all doses in the chronic bioassay. Specifically, the principles recommend that dose selection for chronic studies must be based on sound toxicologic principles; dose selection should consider human exposure; dose selection should be based on a variety of endpoints and effects derived from prechronic studies; and dose selection should consider physicochemical and other factors. Implementation of the principles internationally will have two important benefits: improvement in the quality and consistency of the rodent bioassay and international harmonization of dose selection procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 20
页数:3
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
*EUR CTR EC TOX CH, 1994, DOS SEL CHRON TOX CA
[2]   IFSTP GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN AND INTERPRETATION OF THE CHRONIC RODENT CARCINOGENICITY BIOASSAY [J].
FACCINI, JM ;
BUTLER, WR ;
FRIEDMANN, JC ;
HESS, R ;
REZNIK, GK ;
ITO, N ;
HAYASHI, Y ;
WILLIAMS, GM .
EXPERIMENTAL AND TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 1992, 44 (08) :443-456
[3]  
FORAN JA, IN PRESS SELECTION D
[4]  
GRICE HC, 1984, SELECTION DOSES CHRO
[5]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN USE OF THE MAXIMUM TOLERATED DOSE AND STUDY SENSITIVITY FOR DETECTING RODENT CARCINOGENICITY [J].
HASEMAN, JK ;
LOCKHART, A .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 22 (03) :382-391
[6]  
*INT STAFF GROUP, 1986, ENV HLTH PERSPECT, V67, P201
[7]  
KLAASSEN CD, 1991, TOXICOLOGY BASIC SCI
[8]   HISTORICAL REVIEW OF THE RODENT BIOASSAY AND FUTURE-DIRECTIONS [J].
MCCONNELL, EE .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 21 (01) :38-43
[9]  
MONTESANO R, 1986, IARC SCI PUBLICATION, V83
[10]  
National Research Council, 1993, ISS RISK ASS